My feeling with Scorcese's mafia films is they're great they're masterful etc but they're focused on a very narrow band of humanity, the psychos, perhaps they make the world to round but compared to master and commander: far side of the world you're only getting the slimmest slice of the human condition and THIS WILL NOT DO
His gangster films, his early ones anyway which are more Hoodlum than gangster
(Who’s that knocking/Mean Streets) are extremely personal and yes, very specific to time/place.
It’s very difficult maybe in the way Ken Loach & Mike Leigh (different style from MS not withstanding) if you aren’t familiar with how small NYC was then. Not in population size, but how polarized each neighborhood was to each other. The pool room brawl scene in Mean streets the cop asking where’re you from? The east side! Etc. that shit is 100% on the money. When I was a kid (10-12yo) when your parents said ‘don’t leave the neighborhood’ they were talking about a stretch of maybe two blocks in every direction. Even though if asked where you’re from you would answer ‘Red Hook’ or whatever. Your neighborhood really meant where your local bar, barber, butcher, parish was. It’s an anachronism I know. Mean streets essentially the same story as ‘The pope of Greenwich village, just for a wider audience. Very much in the same way ‘When Harry Met Sally’ was the made for a broader audience version of ‘Annie Hall’.
Goodfella’s is a comedy. If you know of, knew that world.
After Hours was the harbinger of gentrification. Kind of like Times Square in the decade long interregnum of being the sleaze capitol of the city to the Disney world of the city.
I think I already said on here I wasn’t crazy about ‘The Irishman’ the book is far superior.
I do think though that Pesci stole that movie & it was his finest performance on film.