I did actually take a look at his latest link over breakfast - my response was to wonder a why a statistician should be trusted over virologists to be correct about a virus.Mr Tea is like me in that he doesn't beleive in science. He won't read your propellerhead papers. he goes with his gut.
I did actually take a look at his latest link over breakfast - my response was to wonder a why a statistician should be trusted over virologists to be correct about a virus.
Some people have become invested in the idea of the virus being deadly and unprecedented and others have become invested in the idea of the virus being relatively harmless and over-hyped. Like everything else these days, it's just made the argument fucking weird.
I would naively have assumed that to understand virus stats properly, you need to understand the virus part as well as the stats part.Because it's about the virus stats?