You're wasting your time, he's an anti-vaxx cultist.my usual questions: where is this graph from, and what does it say?
is this only for people 80+ years old? shouldn't a valid measure be of everyone, not just a narrow slice of high-risk people?
and is there a direct correlation? is this a graph of people died after they got the vaccination, or just people aged 80+ in general (many of whom may not have been vaccinated) who died in the same time frame of the vaccine rollout?
It's on the news atm: cases going down but deaths somehow going up, up, up.You're wasting your time, he's an anti-vaxx cultist.
It's from Office of National Statistics data afaik; I think it's just 80+s in general.my usual questions: where is this graph from, and what does it say?
is this only for people 80+ years old? shouldn't a valid measure be of everyone, not just a narrow slice of high-risk people?
and is there a direct correlation? is this a graph of people died after they got the vaccination, or just people aged 80+ in general (many of whom may not have been vaccinated) who died in the same time frame of the vaccine rollout?
Well deaths always lag the new infection rate by several weeks, don't they? It's not like you catch it and then fall down with a 'clonk' the next day.It's on the news atm: cases going down but deaths somehow going up, up, up.
Yes they should,Cases peaked Jan 8th; deaths shouldn't be rising ever higher now.
How convenient: 18 days on the nose!Yes they should,
I think it takes an average of 18 days to die with C19.
It's from Office of National Statistics data afaik; I think it's just 80+s in general.
The 80+s are of interest as they've been the object of repeated jabbings.
That's not a contradiction.
It supports it by inference.