yyaldrin
in je ogen waait de wind
Former NSA chief Keith Alexander has joined Amazon’s board of directors
A surveillance-friendly choice.
www.theverge.com
this makes a lot of sense
The Coming Authoritarianism.
www.theverge.com
this makes a lot of sense
yyaldrin
in je ogen waait de wind
Amazon's Alexa for Landlords Is a Privacy Nightmare Waiting to Happen
You know that clip of Steve Carell from The Office where he’s shouting “No, God! No, God, please no! No!...
www.gizmodo.com.au
what could possible go wrong?
Mr. Tea
Let's Talk About Ceps
Why would anyone want one of these fucking things (or the Google or Apple equivalent) in their home?Amazon's Alexa for Landlords Is a Privacy Nightmare Waiting to Happen
You know that clip of Steve Carell from The Office where he’s shouting “No, God! No, God, please no! No!...
what could possible go wrong?
Although I suppose it's only a matter of time before some landlords are insisting on it, if a few aren't already...
luka
Well-known member
We are going to kill all the tech bros and there's nothing you can do about it
Leo
Well-known member
@suspendedreason are you part of the data-collection industrial complex?
sus
Moderator
The companies that succeed are the ones that use data collection. I personally worked for bright-eyed, idealistic, amazing startups with amazing teams trying to sell people on $4 memberships: no ads, you own all your own data, etc. Despite having an amazing product, they couldn't make it work, they poured life energy and libido for half a decade into this incredible platform out of passion and a desire to change the world.
sus
Moderator
Internet users have been very clear about what they want, about the kind of consumption tradeoffs they think are worth it and not worth it. Now they have to live with it. @Linebaugh you mention all the tech companies collecting data: you're looking at the business models that have succeeded. You're looking at companies that are trying to figure out how to monetize. Personalized ads mean less ads; they're almost definitionally less intrusive and have higher returns for providers of ad space; they're a highly elegant solution to a real problem which is that someone's gotta pay for the servers to run, dammit.
sus
Moderator
Don't hate the players; hate the game.
No one's denying there's bad eggs in the Valley. No one's denying that there's real instances of hubris. But hubris and ambition go together; we shouldn't be shocked to see they do. It's up to regulators and consumers to keep these ambitions in check, and to draw lines with their consumption.
No one's denying there's bad eggs in the Valley. No one's denying that there's real instances of hubris. But hubris and ambition go together; we shouldn't be shocked to see they do. It's up to regulators and consumers to keep these ambitions in check, and to draw lines with their consumption.
sus
Moderator
Also as a side note, having personally known several people interviewed by the Times, I wouldn't trust their profiles one bit. There's a strong anti-tech sentiment, and it shouldn't be surprising given ludditism is a signal of the upperclasses (see Paul Fussell's work on class structure in New England). Optimism isn't cool for the same reason that the worst thing you can be, in a cosmopolitan city, is naive/provincial/doe-eyed. Latour talks about this; Wallace talks about it. Jaded cynicism is the currency of the day, and people love cashing in. Besides, human beings need scapegoats! The arrogant, "evil" tech bro is an easy stereotype to play to. Boring! I expect more of this forum.
Last edited: