Keir Starmer

[thirdform]

misreading of land, he argues that acceleration in china will cause trade crisis in west and decline of living standards leading to austerity and intense domestic repression. (fact check: true)

I tbf don't care about Land and deleuzian schizoshite only insofar as you have people trying to fuse him with Marxism. contemplative thinkers are of no interest to me, like artists, we shall subordinate them to the species-algorithm.

 

[ghost]

I tbf don't care about Land, only insofar as you have people trying to fuse him with Marxism. thinkers are of no interest me, like artists, we shall subordinate them to the species-algorithm.

this is what i say when i’m wrong too

 

[thirdform]

this is what i say when i’m wrong too

I don't care to be right about Land. he's not important. even if he became a marxist and accepted our science, he would still be of no interest to me. He gets version going through existential meltdowns, though.

 

[ghost]

something about the dissensus forums turning everyone after long enough to sophistry, very sad development. go outside mr form, escape the uk if you need, whatever it takes to reformulate your sense of the world so you don’t feel drawn to bullshitting online

 

[thirdform]

something about the dissensus forums turning everyone after long enough to sophistry, very sad development. go outside mr form, escape the uk if you need, whatever it takes to reformulate your sense of the world so you don’t feel drawn to bullshitting online

where's the bullshitting?

In America everyone thinks being honest is a virtue, but it's not.

 

[thirdform]

I don't need to track Land's post-2000s arc because he was never right in the 90s to begin with.

 

[thirdform]

but he's wrong about china, anyway. China exports very little capital. the next conflict will be the west turning inwards.

 

[ghost]

I don't need to track Land's post-2000s arc because he was never right in the 90s to begin with.

1994:

As sino-pacific boom and automatized global economic integration crashes the neocolonial world system, the metropolis is forced to re-endogenize its crisis. Hyper-fluid capital deterritorializing to the planetary level divests the first world of geographic privilege; resulting in Euro-American neo-mercantilist panic reactions, welfare state deterioration, cancerizing enclaves of domestic underdevelopment, political collapse, and the release of cultural toxins that speed-up the process of disintegration in a vicious circle.

 

[ghost]

but he's wrong about china, anyway. China exports very little capital. the next conflict will be the west turning inwards.

yes, this is the “re-endogenizing its crisis”

 

[thirdform]

yes, this is the “re-endogenizing its crisis”

meaningless sophism. these developments took place after both world wars. this is no different.

 

[thirdform]

capital's limit is capital itself so of course it's always going to ostensibly 're-endogenize' (great more poncy French-influenced shite.) How many re-endoginizations were there in the 19th century, I wonder.

Term doesn't even make fucking sense. Might as well speak as capital as auttochthonous. idiot!

 

[ghost]

I appreciate Thirdform fact checking himself and deleting this one

 

[william_kent]

i wonder which ones he has, i have a pair of audeze but i think the sound is wrong for my ears

he is very protective about them, I was really drunk one night and sort of criticised his position, but he stood his ground and made a case for the quality of his headphones and I actually apologised ( which is unusual but I was so ashamed that I had made fun of someone for spending stupid money on headphones ) - not one of my finest moments, WE LOVE YOU snav, maybe post again if you have any fingers left after the bitcoin bandits have held you hostage

 

[thirdform]

View attachment 22698
I appreciate Thirdform fact checking himself and deleting this one

I deleted it for the twats bit yeah.

I mean, you're not a twat, not yet. Maybe wanting to tongue the anus of an English windbag, but such follies can be forgiven.

 

[thirdform]

Not by me, I should add.

But I have no tolerance for Franchese anymore. anyone who speaks of molar grids which block becoming should be shot on sight. that extends even to @Clinamenic. He might be a young boy but we have no mercy.

 

[version]

He gets version going through existential meltdowns, though.

When did this happen? In the future?

 

[ghost]

I suppose you could argue that Nick Land did not write Meltdown in 1994, and it was in fact an artifact sent back in time to hyperstitionally realize itself, but that sorta supports Land‘s case.

 

[thirdform]

When did this happen? In the future?

the other month, actually.

You know, you should render all the texts you read into algebraic equations so you don't suffer from this, but instead you come on here.

 

[thirdform]

I suppose you could argue that Nick Land did not write Meltdown in 1994, and it was in fact an artifact sent back in time to hyperstitionally realize itself, but that sorta supports Land‘s case.

he was wrong in 1994. he was wrong in the 2000s. he was wrong in the 2010s. he was wrong in the 2020s, and he will be wrong in 2125. simple as.

 

[version]

the other month, actually.

You know, you should render all the texts you read into algebraic equations so you don't suffer from this, but instead you come on here.

I wasn't reading Nick Land last month. I read Fanged Noumena four years ago.