chava
Well-known member
Yeah it has the groove, but isn't this just pure 90s dub techno? I feel I have 200 records like this
What is Berghain techno these days anyways?
Boring as in uneventful is fine by me. That's what techno is about.
It will always be an aesthetic statement and a comment on other artists/styles.
It helps if you include your own idiosyncrasies, detach from 'scenes', invest yourself a bit (not too much, we won't have any soul pouring stuff going on) and most importantly unsubscribe from the Boomkat newsletter.
gods love you and due respect but that whole line of reasoning is I mean, come on dude, it's nonsense. it's always nonsense.Soul = truth
gods love you and due respect but that whole line of reasoning is I mean, come on dude, it's nonsense. it's always nonsense.
that there's some nebulous quality soul that imparts authenticity is exactly soulboyism. it's dance music's version of rockism.
what is soul? can you point to it, can you explain it?
I can tell you why old guys like old music. it's no mystery and has nothing to do with old music having more soul.
it's because we're old, in popular culture terms, and youth culture is by definition for young people
that's better, because it's closer to an actual definition than just repeating the word "soul" like a totemic mantra.Giving of yourself. Naked, vulnerable expression of whatever your truth is.
I'm confident you'd find the same comments under Tiesto or Ferry Corsten or whoeverIsn't all this scrambled a bit when you've got people leaving comments like this under Senni tunes?
Yeah, probably. But if some people are having as strong a response to that stuff as others to jungle or whatever then how can we say one has soul and the other doesn't? What makes one person's response to James Brown or AFX or whoever more valuable than another's response to Lorenzo Senni or Tiesto?I'm confident you'd find the same comments under Tiesto or Ferry Corsten or whoever
in aesthetic terms, absolutely nothingWhat makes one person's response to James Brown or AFX or whoever more valuable than another's response to Lorenzo Senni or Tiesto ?
in aesthetic terms, absolutely nothing
you perceive the inherent problem of soul. we can't say what has soul and what doesn't even in the loose way we could say something has "energy".
since it's not a definable quality, you're left with either meaningless synonyms (attitude, strength, spirit) or appeals to authority (Cornel West)
worse, not only is it the most nebulous of musical qualities, it's unique in also imparting a moral quality
something which has soul being superior to something which does not
it's - I mean, there's just no other word for it than nonsense, I'm sorry