versh
Well-known member
Some moves are obvious and some bewildering but then reveal or relate a retroactive ordering of the game and how it has been played.
You able to give an example?
Some moves are obvious and some bewildering but then reveal or relate a retroactive ordering of the game and how it has been played.
Sure. I could mention all those Chris Nolan style mindfuck-genre thriller movies with twist endings that have you diving for a Reddit synopsis (where you relive the plot with a new lens of understanding). But less elaborately, it's that feeling where a line in the book just subtly stands out to you, snags your coat as you walk by, only half-noticed. And then a chapter later something happens that snaps you back to that moment—something was off here, something was wrong, and now I know why.You able to give an example?
Sure. I could mention all those Chris Nolan style mindfuck-genre thriller movies with twist endings that have you diving for a Reddit synopsis (where you relive the plot with a new lens of understanding). But less elaborately, it's that feeling where a line in the book just subtly stands out to you, snags your coat as you walk by, only half-noticed. And then a chapter later something happens that snaps you back to that moment—something was off here, something was wrong, and now I know why.
Oh yeah I think this (what you describe) happens more with art than literature.Oh, you mean within a given work. I thought you meant within the broader scope of the form, like a book that seemingly comes out of nowhere and reactivates a bunch of forgotten books.
I feel this as an Artist myself. If I can nail an initial detail of a drawing I know I will be able flesh it out into a full composition no matter how small or insignificant that intial detail will become. You just need to get that cycle to turn once and youre goodNarrative I think "exists" insofar as it is a series of updating understandings/models. Things seem to follow next naturally. Others are jarring. Some turns are obvious i.e. foreseen and others are surprising i.e. unforeseen. Understanding of narrative fragment shapes understanding of macro structure shapes understanding of narrative fragment, ad nauseam.
Did you just read that? I remember you mentioned it at the Cale show.Eerie synchronicity with Crying of Lot 49 and my thought-train all day which was all about the nature of coincidence