Liebniz was mentioned in the Deleuze quote (believe it was a deleuze quote) that Luka mentioned.
I was just clarifying what was meant by Liebnizian.
We can say that the monad is fractal, I suppose, to the extent that it resembles the set of all monads. You "press into" the monad to find that its parts (reflections of other monads?) are each, themselves, comprised of "secondary" reflections, and you now have this *ahem* fractal differance.
As it relates to garden of forking paths, I would be almost purely speculating/extrapolating, seeing as I haven't read it in a long time, nor did I have a real understanding of it then.