imagine how i feel with my wonderful poetry thread then!
These are really good.
stunning
he was his secretary wasnt he. he wrote a thing book afterwards. trying to look outward at the world of things. im not hugely impressed with it but then again i dont read german. i also try to look at the thing-world periodically and it doesnt come naturally for me eitherI started reading Rilke's book about Rodin the other night and it was really good tbf so NO DISRESPECT INTENDED.
Have not read that, but I have heard her speak of such things in the talks and seminars she gives.I'm glad I've got you thinking in game terms Linebaugh
This show looks great
Actually speaking of games, @Clinamenic have you read Mackenzie Wark's Game Theory? That question goes out to everybody ofc, but if anyone has read a Verso author I'm putting my money on Stan
I think that we make these judgments/categorizations, on initial impressions, that anchor later judgments and are what, in a sense, allow for redemptions.What I found interesting with Love Island (and some other shows like this) is that you start off hating every single contestant and watching it in order to hate them, but after a few episodes you start becoming more sympathetic towards certain contestants, you start liking some of them in spite of yourself... It's interesting cos Love Island is associated with contestants killing themselves, it's quite a toxic show, and of course highbrows look down at it from 30,000 feet. But it's got real value to it AFAIC cos it shows that people who you write off as being superficial idiots can often turn out to have charms and hidden depths.
+1 for the "external attractiveness is 70% a proxy for psychological qualities" hypothesisAnother interesting development in love is blind is that there were actually a few unattractive contestants, but they never found their match in the dating game and left the show. This all despite the fact the contestants of course cant see who they are talking too.