woops
is not like other people
bits of flesh and blood and cells floating about.
bits of flesh and blood and cells floating about.
Watching Before I Go To Sleep right now which is an embarrassing ripoff of Memento... except that in that guy pierce was a superhuman who could beat his way out of any jeopardy his memory problems gave him (until SPOILER you find out he was the bad guy all along) whereas in this Nicole Kidman is pathetically vulnerable to every new revelation.This is it though isn't it. We get trapped as humans cos we want there to be something beyond, so there's some meaning in our lives. And we realise there just isn't at various points in our lives.
Then we just make some other shit up to keep going.
Like the amnesia guy in memento.
good lad. get back down the pub tomorrowI'm very hungover today I drank 12 pints in the sun yesterday
Weird Modernist aesthetic ITT/on this board of caring more about mechanism innovation than about synthesis, logistics, deployment.
No, that was one lineage of musical development. A narrative made up by people living in Schoenberg's time and milieu. A reasonable narrative for them, but for our purposes, we can see the wider picture: a long history of development, not just scales/modes/notes but timbers and affects and rhythms which is healthy and alive today. This is de-colonializing the Western Canon, I think.Counterpoint! But didn't our present music ultimately historically come to an end with Schoenberg, early electronics, and free jazz? Everything after that has been about romanticism (including left protest music.) Is it wrong to cling to a modernist aesthetic in these circumstances? The fantasy is nice, the deployment provides the thrills, for sure, but what else can one say after that?
But the great pop acts are always acts of synthesis, logistics, deployment.
That's what pop is, at a fundamental level.
Revisionism a la Carl Wilson's Celine Dion book, generalism with its gaze prised off of the present and focused backwards in time, this surveys 20th Century American popular music with a view to correcting the neglect and salving the slight inflicted by Rockism to various forms of "light" music that (it's darned well proved!) were what the majority of punters actually listened to, danced to, enjoyed, as opposed to, oh rock'n'roll and bebop and Motown and what have you. So it's basically everything that would be left out of Greil Marcus's list at the end of Stranded, or banished from Dave Marsh's The Heart of Rock and Soul greatest singles ever book. There's certainly value and interest to coming up with a different shape for the past, the disorientation of an up-ended perspective. But then you also have to wonder what it is about the Rock(ist) Narrative that is so compelling that it made people A/ bring it into existence in the first place and B/ keep on sustaining it with a torrent of critical writing, books, fan discourse, etc. It's not just generational narcissism, I don't think, or a case of "history gets written by the victors" (are they really victors here, and if so what are their spoils?). What I'm getting is, nothing was stopping people writing histories about the other stuff, Doris Day or Pat Boone or Engelbert Humperdinck or whatever… Same as nothing ever stopped anyone from writing a history of electronic dance music in the Nineties that made trance or handbag house the central narrative. That those people haven't come forth tells you something about the motivating power of certain kinds of music, their ability to generate Myth.
No, that was one lineage of musical development. A narrative made up by people living in Schoenberg's time and milieu. A reasonable narrative for them, but for our purposes, we can see the wider picture: a long history of development, not just scales/modes/notes but timbers and affects and rhythms which is healthy and alive today. This is de-colonializing the Western Canon, I think.
Partially. Greatness and auteur theory are ultimately antithetical to pop, yet must exist in constant tension with it. More people in the 1960s and 1970s listened to Umm Kulthum's interpretations of arabic classical music than they did the Beatles and David Bowie, in excess of 500 million (Rachit taha talks about this in his Wire Invisible jukebox) yet a highly specific and not very globally relevant auteur like Bowie is canonised today. So far from trying to escape the modernist trap you accuse this forum of harbouring, you end up sharing its core assumptions. Which is fine. I am not one of those people who thinks the modernist project can just be rejected outright to please the present academic vogue. Pop music itself is a contradiction, it is never so-called 'immediate music.'
Here is @blissblogger putting it more eloquently than me
That last sentence is key here. The ability to generate myth, to bring a forward momentum to the table is the key determining factor of great pop, never what the masses are listening to in all their gloriously incompatible mess at one point. Pop then itself is a memory, a memory of selective omission. If it wasn't, it could not move forward. This is where Adorno is wrong, but wrong in an interesting way.
![]()
blissblog
blissout.blogspot.com
No question that Bowie isn't some icon of anti-rockism—I just wanted to advance the notion that the rejection of Bowie on this board was happening on fairly rockist grounds.
I like Blissblogger's characterization of pop as myth, but I think this is the sort of logic that leads us to call Bowie a great pop artist.
What would you want out of your pop music, specifically, that's not in MBDTF?Kanye was more of the avant-yob right up to the 808s and heartbreak era. That was a great pop album in the collective innovation mould. Everything after that has been more about curating a beatnik crowd. I was listening to My Dark Twisted Fantasy the other day and so little of it actually resonated with me as direct pop music today. Bowie is like this.
No question that Bowie isn't some icon of anti-rockism—I just wanted to advance the notion that the rejection of Bowie on this board was happening on fairly rockist grounds.
I like Blissblogger's characterization of pop as myth, but I think this is the sort of logic that leads us to call Bowie a great pop artist.
What would you want out of your pop music, specifically, that's not in MBDTF?