woops
is not like other people
I knew it! Tea is an agentCan confirm, I was in charge of tying victims securely to the altar so we could zap their heads off with the proton beam.
I knew it! Tea is an agentCan confirm, I was in charge of tying victims securely to the altar so we could zap their heads off with the proton beam.
I have a suspicion time is not in any way like a frikkin rugby ball!thats like something from bataille's documents.
1q 184 magical - what is your view on this time as a rugby bal thing? do we need to dump it?
Says “![]()
CERN Opened the Door: What Came Through?
A blog about esoteric symbolism in pop culture and the media.secretsun.blogspot.com
We nearly played the CERN collider. They asked us to do it! We were gonna play in it before they’d thrown the switch. But it was a timing thing—their timings didn’t coincide with ours.
So you never got to tear a hole in the fabric of space-time.
This of course, is Fake-Spiritualized”Yeah, they were already doing something—there were too many tiny objects whizzing around in there!
But why is the behavior of electrons considered non mechanistic?Because we still work with mechanistic models and life in a mechanical reality
don’t understand…?basically we cannot conceive of transofrmation as something that happens as an all in one
i mean that a lot of things in life are a transformational process going on. like you get your soup, put it in the pan, turn the cooker on and it heats up.don’t understand…?
Look no I don’t mean it that way. Here is a quote I just read that correlates (because this brave new world thing has stamped and embedded itself upon our post war minds and I think it’s false), from a film theory essay- “Jacques Aumont provides a vivid analysis of the divergent relationship which cinema has with modernity in comparison to the other arts: It’s clear, modernity is not a matter of art or art history, it is a matter of historical conscience and a system- intellectual, moral and, ultimately, ontological - for relating to the world. The modern person starts from defiance towards the world, our world … Strange modernity, which wants to encounter its era, but where it is closest to that which is unchanging: the notion of being-in-the-world, Geworfenheit, the inherent ambiguity of reality… Modern cinema leaves the world to manage on its own in order for it to have meaning.”How am I supposed to know. I hate science. I think it's fake. Anyway it's for nerds.
No, this is awesome, thanks… so it’s basically delineated by transformation that is clearly discernible to humans (whereas actually there is changing all the time maybe maybe not), based right ‘here’i mean that a lot of things in life are a transformational process going on. like you get your soup, put it in the pan, turn the cooker on and it heats up.
there's the moment of transformation, when you see the bubbles, and it's becoming the other thing, the thing that was the first thing, but is now going to be hot.
we as mere humans with our limited consciousness cannot see that whole thing as one thing, we have to split it up. we can't see that the soup is always hot, always cold.
even, now, in the way i've put it, i sound like an idiot, new age or something, and that's the other problem, language cannot articulate it either.
(Well since I was at one time inappropriately accosted by a sadhu I don’t think much of their profession)- it’s both isn’t itbut "changing all the time" implies that there is a change whereas i think alan moore and other sadhus might say there is in fact no change at all