Lotringer claimed Semiotext(e) mapped out the whole decade when they published this, Baudrillard's Simulations and Virilio's Pure War in '83.
Surely there's no such thing as 'unnatural'? Everything's made out of naturally occurring things. Our lifestyle isn't unnatural. It's like saying it's 'unnatural' for a chimp to use sticks and stones as tools. They've developed to the point where that's just what they do.
yeah yeah yeah everyone knows that
we had to haze you as if you were a newcomer. it was obligatory.Well, this has been a real damp squib of a comeback
For an encore, I suggest you start a music thread titled "Hey, anyone else here like jungle?", something like that.Well, this has been a real damp squib of a comeback
Tell me what the meaningful distinction is, what is the difference that makes a differencei cant see what is to be gained by erasing what is clearly a useful and meaningful distinction but we've done these entry level arguments loads of times anyway
only if you like that sort of thing. you wont learn anything from it.Do you recommend I read this?
we've done these tedious entry level debate club debates beforeTell me what the meaningful distinction is, what is the difference that makes a difference
AFAICT distinctions of what is and isn't natural seems mainly to be a rhetorical trick for attacking or defending a given practice, object, etc
I refuse to accept the existing, implicit world-structure as it is created and maintained by everyday language... I prefer to interrogate my world-carvings, tyvmi cant see what is to be gained by erasing what is clearly a useful and meaningful distinction but we've done these entry level arguments loads of times anyway