luka
Well-known member
1994 included, especially '94. never '95.or is it all good can I start literally anywhere
ok anything before 1994
1994 included, especially '94. never '95.or is it all good can I start literally anywhere
ok anything before 1994
never ever listen to any retrospective mix. only listen to radio sets and recordings from club nights and raves.
you werent even born!No, this is not true, as I've had to repeatedly drill into your skull. Retrospective mixes are good for the connoisseurs. Gus isn't one of them yet.
you werent even born!
he needs to get a feel for the 'gestalt'. and the way to do that is to address the primary documents like a good historian
if you keep giving me a hard time im not going to listen to that fucking mix of yours|! like, can i have a break please?!!Completely agreed but can you not use the term gestalt? It makes you sound like a dodgy yoga instructor in goa.
if you keep giving me a hard time im not going to listen to that fucking mix of yours|! like, can i have a break please?!!
I just need good coding music. Mindless background stimulation.but tbh it's ok not to like it. it was a long time ago and its not your cup of tea.
I just need good coding music. Mindless background stimulation.
this is actually very straitlaced and conservative by his standardsYeah I feel like I'm losing my mind listening to this but I'm here for it
this is actually very straitlaced and conservative by his standards
he's already reviewed jungleYou have some choppy synths that go "dun dun, dun-dun-dun" like a million times and you some distorted piano chords that then echo the exact same rhythm on a loop, mayyyybe moving around a half-step melodically; there's some kind of chirpy flute up high, a bandpass moves over the mix to make it swell, there's a break for a drum fill before another goddam chirpy cassio enters