The Depopulation Agenda

hmg

hmg

Victory lap
Communists are the worst polluters too. Terrible environmental policies, communists. Many birds, one stone.
 
hmg

hmg

Victory lap
Fusion development is a markedly international effort, so the spoils would be shared from the outset. At present, globalism has little to offer except sophisticated communication technology for the serfs, shit preachy politics, and immense riches for the already wealthy. If it also offered access to infinite, clean energy, people would be less suspicious and more open to their hegemonising.
 
Mr. Tea

Mr. Tea

Let's Talk About Ceps
luka said:
what are the biggest and best arguments for a human cull on a massive scale?
carbon stuff, pollution more generally, plastics, soil erosion, habitat destruction,
loss of biodiversity, people are annoying and get in the way of a nice view....
Click to expand...
This is what it boils down to, I think.
 
shakahislop

shakahislop

Well-known member
luka said:
what are the biggest and best arguments for a human cull on a massive scale?
carbon stuff, pollution more generally, plastics, soil erosion, habitat destruction,
loss of biodiversity, people are annoying and get in the way of a nice view....
Click to expand...
psytrance
 
shakahislop

shakahislop

Well-known member
luka said:
what are the biggest and best arguments for a human cull on a massive scale?
carbon stuff, pollution more generally, plastics, soil erosion, habitat destruction,
loss of biodiversity, people are annoying and get in the way of a nice view....
Click to expand...
man city
 
version

version

Well-known member

those hairshirt -wearin' Dissensians

Tim Finney came up with an intriguing comment on an ILM thread, describing a certain contingent at Dissensus in the following terms (the comment coming out of a discussion of MIA aka Mud Hut Lady and the debates here about popism): "When one of them finally and openly says "I love this piece...
dissensus.com
 
luka

luka

Well-known member
Monks wore hair shirts to chastise themselves, it's an ascetic thing, self flagellating thing. They're uncomfortable
 
Mr. Tea

Mr. Tea

Let's Talk About Ceps
yyaldrin said:
can you copy the article? i can't read it?
Click to expand...
I would, but I've already clicked away from it and I've now used up my month's supply of free articles.

The basic gist is that when fusion power comes online (and he thinks it's a question of when, not if), it will solve all our energy problems forever, and that greens hate this because they're weirdos who hate technology and want us all to go back to living in the middle ages.

He does have half a point, in that there are elements in hardcore eco activist circles who are strongly technophobic and disapprove of any solution to climate change other than radical degrowth. (What's more common, I think, is people who are strongly in favour of some technological solutions - solar and wind energy, very often - and strongly opposed to others, mainly conventional nuclear energy, while ignoring that no technological solution is perfect, and all manufacturing has some unavoidable ecological footprint.)

But he also thinks, or wants us to think that he thinks, that climate change is something that might happen decades in the future, rather than something that's been going on for over a century already.
 
Mr. Tea

Mr. Tea

Let's Talk About Ceps
But as per @luka, it's the Telegraph, so it's not really for reading, so much as inhaling a sort of ambient "harrumph" from.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top