version
Well-known member
Were you?
Yeah, somewhat. I like his books and had assumed he'd be above that sort of thing.
Were you?
the internet has made people believe that the sky is not Real
the internet has made people believe that the sky is not Real
Was this about Oatibix vs Weetabix again?I witnessed and was minorly part of a twitter storm the other week, and when I said to someone "I wasn't talking to you", they freaked and went "This is the internet! You're talking to everyone" and I was like "I was talking to everyone, yeah, but not to you" and they then went and dug up everything they could find about me - which was fun - and proceeded to try and post it and besmirch my identity, which was a joke cos it wasn't my real profile. The whole storm wasn't even about me. It was really awful for the people involved in the real storm though, I haven't witnessed one in real time before, thousands of people suddenly becoming hideous moral barometers, it was really quite scary.
Yes, in real life I would probably prefer Annie Wilkes to Godzilla rather than the other way round.I read a discussion last night where someone said they felt there were people mistaking their porn preferences for their sexuality. The argument was they may not actually be into the things they're watching if they were to encounter them irl because the porn experience doesn't make use of the full range of senses.
If I were a macrophile I would prefer Godzilla in real life.
Eveything is small online. Measure it, it's tiny.Debatable. The point of this thread, really
I can just imagine Raquel Welch looming over me. I think you might be right Dilbo!
I wouldn't call sterilising children because of fundamental errors of fact and logical argument inconsequential.
Earth calling thirdform. Come in, thirdform.But surely sterilisation is acceptable given you have led us to believe you are a geniocrat?
Errors of fact and logic shouldn't matter, in your schema, given that the plebeian herd will always make fundamental errors of fact and logic.