version
Well-known member
I doubt anyone here even knows there is a 70s and even an 60s mac
I doubt anyone here even knows there is a 70s and even an 60s mac
Yeah we have nothing in common with you music wise. Rock doesnt exist in this cpuntry
This is what I was trying to say to @version . it's not that the distinction he is making is cowardice, it's that humans must function by frameworks which are dynamic and mutable. there is no non-framework functioning.
The interesting thing about the supposed "zone of fruitless intensification" is that I sense people putting limits on electronic music as to what is acceptable, but where they might not otherwise do it with non-electronic music.
Take, for example, breakbeats. Apparently, there is an acceptable level in the amount in they can be chopped and diced and spliced etc. because it otherwise becomes "student music", but at the same time, that person might like to listen to non-electronic music that sounds like completely random, meandering nonsense to the average person (like maybe say some records by Sun Ra, for example).
What book of his was your favourite?
To continue following this example, I would actually prefer it like luke if you hated AE, but that's not the point I'm making. What I'm saying is you should own your prejudices about sound design music.
Humour me for a second and imagine you are Patty Stockhausen, you would probably find Autechre's restrictions in dance rhythms primitive and kitschy. So it's about where you look at it, right?
Sounds like my idea of hell, I must be honest. Even when I was a binge drinker I detested such environments and ended up alone with my bottle and free jazz recordings. Noone wants to listen to John Coltrane at a bar at 3 AM.
And actually, how are swift and sheran much different? simple disposable tunes for drunks to hum along to at 3 AM. You're making Fleetwood Mac out to be Albert Ayler or something. It's really not that deep.
If you want to make an argument that a lot of experimental music today has to be pitched to egghead academia, then yes absolutely I would agree. I think AE avoid that, but it's a totally good criticism, the avant-garde has regressed back into the academia, weird ideas are not mainstream anymore.
but the mac? come on! That's craner levels of laziness.
it's very nice. spiritual contentment. tropical. fine ladies and fine men. balearic. Not sure if I could dwell in that zone for ever (well, I know I can't) but it can be a good voyage.
I wouldn't mind a revival of a fleetwood mac type band but without the horrible singalong in some stupid bar. noone goes to bars anymore. they were a mistake. our descendents will laugh at how primitive our narcotics were when they will be in space making contact with alien lifeforms and taking voyages across the milkyway.
Are you asking me to take a harder line than it doesn't really do much for me? It really is the case here though. But if you want I could say it's about as compelling as an hour long podcast on socialism with @mixed_biscuits, hosted by Davina McCall. Or are you asking something else?
Stockhausen said all that about Aphex didn't he. Which is a perfect a way to put my point across. Why? Because for every 1000 times I listen to Aphex, maybe 2-3 times I would listen to Stockhausen. Like ganz graf, I like that Stockhausen exists and that people are exploring those territories and I like to pass through them once in a while. But do I stop for long, or overnight, or for a weekend or more? No. Can I see things from Stockhausen's perspective? Of course. He is coming at it from an intellectual academic's deconstructive, quasi scientific angle which is interesting for the avant garde head in me, but I rarely sit and listen to that kind of thing. Having said that, it's been a while so maybe I'll give both 7.30 and some Stockhausen a whirl because a lot has changed in my tastes the closer I get to collecting a pension
That doesn't surprise me. But I seem to remember you getting a contact nostalgia high when I was describing an evening in Asilah, Morocco where the local fishermen would get together in a little shack near the port on a Friday and have a late night jam session based around some old ass Moroccan classics, with tea and hash and everyone getting right the fuck into it singing along. It seemed to stir some distant emotional memory of yours. Could be wrong, was years ago now. Maybe that's the same kind of thing? Songs that have been sang for generations that glue people together. That's what good songwriting can do.
Au contraire, mon amis. When it comes to pop music, it doesn't get much deeper.
Wait so now @luka sanctions them you've changed your tune? Kin 'ell third. Get it together
But this is it, I don't see a huge difference between gantz graf and Aphex. Maybe I just have ears that are more calibrated to rhythm, but I don't think Stockhausen would care for Gantz graf. he would see it all coalescing back to metric and period rhythms and not being totally free. Part of what appeals to me about Autechre is they let the software break the rhythm and then allow it to return to electro-techno rhythms. it's this variation in their tracks I like, whereas most techno and electro just stays at one rhythm. It's closer to middle eastern music in that regard, though obviously much more mechanical and much less organic. composed pieces in non-metric and non-periodic rhythms are for the most part not very interesting to listen to (with the exception of composers originally coming from jazz such as Braxton and Silva). It's like trying to solve an equation in realtime. But that doesn't mean the concept is bad, if it was, you would have to say goodbye to taksim, jazz, free improv, etc. It's just that it doesn't really work when you are trying to subordinate it to a score.
It's closer to middle eastern music in that regard, though obviously much more mechanical and much less organic. composed pieces in non-metric and non-periodic rhythms are for the most part not very interesting to listen to (with the exception of composers originally coming from jazz such as Braxton and Silva).
What people working with this sort of generative music software are now realising is something we've known in the middle east for centuries, music functioning as productive and communal communication. The latest thing Autechre are now doing is this huge live 2022-24 thing, basically so many variations on this one big system/piece. 19 of them in counting now. Obviously listening to them in one sitting would be torturous but that's precisely not the point, just like in the olden days improvisation itself was used to break up or extend parts of the repertoire as a backdrop to peoples social activities (weddings etc.) Incidentally this is why Eno is even more of an absolute cone head compared to that of Stockhausen when handling the concept of ambient music.
You forget that folk musics from these regions are/were heavily based on melodic improvisation. No two performances are remotely identical. Of course no two live performances in pop music are identical, but that's a question of quantity.
the quantitative variation in makam and microtonal folk musics is much higher than that in a pop song which is repeated, where the quantitative variations are miniscule.
Sure but pop is a fantasy. You just like the stars from the 80s. No shade, I do as well (although probably different ones.) But the industry must keep generating stars in ever more fantastical configurations. There is no pop music that isn't manufactured. This isn't even a problem, it can be quite liberating when you don't pine for the authentic.
like the guy before said that there are no experimentations with alternate tunings within elctronic music, but there are, quite a lot actually - and good ones too. just connect to the node.
I didn't say there are none, but that it really hadn't started to be explored - that's why I said that Wendy Carlos was the only name that immediately came to mind because there seems to be so little of it (I already knew 2 or of the 3 artists you posted - only Sevish was new to me, and I had also said that I had been trying to remember Zia's name (someone I encountered decades ago so not exactly "new") so maybe you could please make me a list because another person, @thirdform , who has also always been a constant and deep digger, seemed to agree.
If there's quite a lot, I'd especially like to know if you can point out those electronic artists that use alternate tunings in conjuction with heavier sounds and beats and/or things like noise and distortion, please.
it's not a node i'm particulary familiar with, but just through a cursory search with our military grade search engines, there seems to be a loads and loads. dunno, just some random results
https://bandcamp.com/discover/xenharmonic - a pretty massive list just on bandcamp
there's also a podcast dedicated to just that (obviously not just electronica though) - https://nowandxen.libsyn.com/
it's not a node i'm particulary familiar with, but just through a cursory search with our military grade search engines, there seems to be a loads and loads. dunno, just some random results