ok then, what is communism?

[thirdform]

I dare you to run a little organisation along Communist principles and report back. BTW this forum is run on capitalist principles primarily.

why aren't you answering my questions?

 

[thirdform]

two very simple questions
1) do you prefer liz mountbatten or liz trussy
2) didn't your dad fund the pcr?

 

[mixed_biscuits]

So Marxist theory is blatantly wrong, which is probably why none of the big stuff it predicted has happened. It's intellectually and scientifically bankrupt.

 

[thirdform]

So Marxist theory is blatantly wrong, which is probably why none of the big stuff it predicted has happened. It's intellectually and scientifically bankrupt.

you're an idealist though, science is bankrupt because all creation is divine.

 

[thirdform]

but you're wrong, everything it has predicted has happened, even the fall of the USSR. you just don't know how to think.

this is why your dad sent you to cambridge university instead of entrusting his biscuits factory to you because you cannot understand how to harness invariant categories.

 

[mixed_biscuits]

you're an idealist though, science is bankrupt because all creation is divine.

Wrong. Science is possible because all creation is divine.

 

[thirdform]

Wrong. Science is possible because all creation is divine.

then why is there geocentrism in bible?

 

[thirdform]

or are you one of them fucking weirdos who believes in god without religion, the ultimate agnostic pussyole compromise. even more centrist dad than @Mr. Tea !

 

[thirdform]

I mean she wasn't a real Stalinist, the same way you aren't a real Communist.

∀x ∈ {real_communist, fake_communist}, x ⊆ n₁ ⇒ x ≡ n
limₓ→contradiction ( n) x = n + 1
∴ Category(real_communist, fake_communist) ∉ PathTo(n + 1)

 

[germaphobian]

∀x ∈ {real_communist, fake_communist}, x ⊆ n₁ ⇒ x ≡ n
limₓ→contradiction ( n) x = n + 1
∴ Category(real_communist, fake_communist) ∉ PathTo(n + 1)

∫₀^∞ [Innovation(t) * Privatization(t)] dt − lim_(☭→Breadline, Plan→Shortage) CommunistSystem(☭, Plan) + Σₖ=₁^∞ [InvisibleHand(StockMarket) / ConsumerChoice(k)] = CapitalistVictory * (McDonalds(1989) / Marx(1848))

 

[version]

I'll tell you one thing about communism, regardless of whether you agree with it. It's very dry and complicated.

 

[thirdform]

∫₀^∞ [Innovation(t) * Privatization(t)] dt − lim_(☭→Breadline, Plan→Shortage) CommunistSystem(☭, Plan) + Σₖ=₁^∞ [InvisibleHand(StockMarket) / ConsumerChoice(k)] = CapitalistVictory * (McDonalds(1989) / Marx(1848))

how McDonald's tried to turn marx into a common liberal, but only by eating feudalism and calling the bill ‘freedom.’

∀ n ∈ CapitalistSystems, ∃ f ∈ {ForcesOfProduction, RelationsOfProduction} such that:

lim₍Innovation → ∞₎ [Socialisation(Labourₙ) + StateControl(Forcesₙ)] = CollectiveCapitalₙ

⇒ InvisibleHand = ∅, as Capitalₙ → ConsciousPlanning

∴ ∃ (n + 1) = Communism, emerging immanently from n — not refuted by n₁ < (n + 1)

⟹ LaissezFaire( n ) ⇔ ⊥, since:

Stateₙ ≠ ExternalImposition
but = Result[FeudalPower → ∅, LandedProperty → CommodityForm]

⇒ Attempt(N + 2) = Contradiction, as:

CapitalistDevelopment ⇒ StateMediation
⇒ ¬Possibility[ReturnTo(N −)] ⟹ N + 2 ∉ ℝₑ

 

[0bleak]

I was thinking today about my good ol' USA, and how it's so fucked up that you can't really get by very easily (outside of maybe a dozen cities) without a car since living here has been so totally and completely structured around having a car. So you automatically have to have and maintain something expensive just to get by day to day (that is, if you don't want to spend 10 times the amount of time getting places you need to get to on a regular basis like a grocery store, or having a social life, etc.) especially if you live in suburbs or rural areas.

 

[other_life]

communism is a ham hock in your corn flake

 

[Clinamenic]

communism is a ham hock in your corn flake

Finally, a straightforward answer