elly
WOEBOT said:
re someone like elephant man, the key to grasping him may lie in understanding him primarily as a kinetic performer, rather than a recording artist per se. .
his nickname is the Energy God, right?
(if such a deity really existed, that would be my religion actually. that's my philosophic bone of contention with kpunk, he's into everything becoming inanimate and uttunul-like, i'm into what some ardkore record titled itself, "the quickening")
WOEBOT said:
hmm. have to disagree here. i think the way the cultural-group-mind (just dont say scenius

) works is that often the music advances into territory whos delineation is not dictated entirely by its sonic qualities.ts a muso-centric perspective to assume that the sonic is always the most important factor to a "music"..
that's a good point, seems like it would have a bunch of applications
if i was feeling more energetic this morning i'd try and think of a whole series of examples in the history of pop where the non-musical factors take over and are steering where things are going. Glam rock is one presumably
i used to be a Sound First kind of guy, mainly a reaction to the way record reviewers in the UK would almost entirely deal with lyrics or socio-political stuff or the artist's biography/personality and hardly every deal with the stuff of sound itself (actually American rock critics were even worse, in those days )
but now i think the whole thing about pop is that it's this messy hybrid of sound, words, persona, socio-politico-cultural context, biography/neurosis, performance, clothes, choreography, charisma