vimothy
yurp
I am arguing against nuclear proliferation. You argue for nuclear racism, whereby some states are allowed (the established powers), the rest must remain unarmed, hence at the mercy of the powerful west, as has been the case since ... well, if you want a number, what about 1471.
The point is: as long as "the others" have nukes, it is rational for "us" to have nukes.
Well, personally I think that your position is racist: those poor little muslim victims, unable to act for themselves withouty the dead hand of the West heavy on their shoulders, only want to play like the big boys and have their own warheads ...
are you talking about Bush? Olmert? Putin?
None of the above; why don't you answer the question?
[WTF does Putin have to do with any of this by the way? Rusia ain't no Western state]
are you talking about Bush? Olmert? Putin?
None of the above; why don't you answer the question?
are you talking about Bush? Olmert? Putin?
None of the above; why don't you answer the question?