The second half makes up for the slowness of the first, imo; some absolutely devastating moments. Also a film which actually makes digital look good.i watched the start of that Portrait Of A Lady On Fire film, everyone seems to love it, but I thought it was incredibly boring. lasted an hour and turned it off, gave it a second go, turned it off almost straight away. I do not recommend this film
yeah i assumed that something must happen at some point! and that slow burn can be totally worth it sometimes. on what it looks like though, that was something i found offputting. it looks (presumably deliberately given the subject matter) like early 19th / 18th century painting. which i mostly experience as something i walk past at galleries on my way to the more modern stuff, i don't really like it.The second half makes up for the slowness of the first, imo; some absolutely devastating moments. Also a film which actually makes digital look good.
The red fire of the oil well against the lush green of the jungle; the strange, purple section toward the end; the ruthless ending; the Tangerine Dream score; the four character introductions; the palpable heat; the bridge; the dynamite. I loved it.Here's a question, is Sorcerer really that good? I think I have listed in top 10s and recommended it before, so I thought I watch it with my sister on our weekly film night. Told her it was good but took a while to get going.
We ended up watching it in two goes.
The first hour was really disjointed as I remember it, and then the second hour, there's two memorable scenes; the bridge crossing which is actually a bit cheesy, and then the brilliant set piece where he cuts a pocket out of a blokes trousers to make a sand time to blow up a fallen tree blocking their path... but other than that, hardly anything of note in the film and me and my sister/brother in law were all disappointed after my glowing recommendation.
Well now I need to see it too.The red fire of the oil well against the lush green of the jungle; the strange, purple section toward the end; the ruthless ending; the Tangerine Dream score; the four character introductions; the palpable heat; the bridge; the dynamite. I loved it.
it still blows my mind that they planned on making 6 movies out of thisJust seen a film called King Arthur; Legend of the Sword directed by Guy Ritchie - now with that title you might think it was gonna be about the guy in the legend with the round table and Guinivere and Sir Lancelot and so on but actually it turns out to have nothing to do with that whatsoever. No, wait a minute, I'm wrong again, it IS about that King Arthur, it's just that Ritchie has added a few embellishments of his own to the famous legend - and to be honest, I am all for that; if you're making a film of something like this that has been adapted so many times, told and re-told and of which there is surely no totally agreed definitive version, then that means you have plenty of wiggle room for putting your own stamp on it...
But you can understand my confusion when it begins with Arthur growing up a street urchin in a ghetto in Londinium (presumably in the East Endium) where he learns martial arts from a wise old Chinese guy called Kung-Fu George. That's not a joke by the way, I am one hundred percent serious when I tell you that Guy Ritchie's King Arthur grows up running a gang of petty criminals and prostitutes in a ghetto where he also studies kung fu.
Soon after that though, he has pulled the mythical shooter Excalibur from out of a stone and he's found a tasty bunch of cockernee knights to help him do over the local mob boss and demon knight Vortigern - there are two hours of shoot outs, elephants with cities on their back, a giant snake and a humorous mix-up over a marijuana factory before he faces off against the afore-mentioned demon knight, beats him and then - as if Ritchie has just remembered what story he's telling - he builds a round table right at the end. It's bollocks.
Plus, Dwayne Johnson was absent from this installment, and sorely missed. This scene, from the seventh installment, I think captures the ethos of the franchise (Just the first 1:20)