matt b
Indexing all opinion
Yeah but they only work 9-4 and they get loads of time off in the summer!![]()
8.30 til 4, thanks
and only 6 weeks off in the summer.
Yeah but they only work 9-4 and they get loads of time off in the summer!![]()
Yeah but they only work 9-4 and they get loads of time off in the summer!![]()
Vimothy - we all know that the govt is not going to give a 10% rise to anyone (including themselves)
There are some very rich GPs who might disagree with you there.
Anyway, whilst this has centred on school teachers I think it is interesting how certain branches of the labour force are far less sympathetically treated even here - tube workers for example. It can't be all Crowe's doing (and is he seen as a tit cos he does sound like a throwback to the 70s, complete with regional accent and diction out of central casting?)
True but that's an issue to do with setting the base rate rather than the yearly increase. I mean that if you sign up to a job at a given pay rate which is deemed fair by your employers you are surely not signing up to (effectively) earning less every year."Yeah but they only work 9-4 and they get loads of time off in the summer!"
Regional accents have zilch to do with it. How else would you expect the leaders of a working class union to speak?
How many of those parents who have had to take time off to look after their kids think its a good idea that the teachers are on strike? (instead of a day of self indulgence I too am looking after both my kids as tehir primary school is shut)
Anyway, whilst this has centred on school teachers I think it is interesting how certain branches of the labour force are far less sympathetically treated even here - tube workers for example. It can't be all Crowe's doing (and is he seen as a tit cos he does sound like a throwback to the 70s, complete with regional accent and diction out of central casting?)
True but that's an issue to do with setting the base rate rather than the yearly increase. I mean that if you sign up to a job at a given pay rate which is deemed fair by your employers you are surely not signing up to (effectively) earning less every year.
I found it ironic that when Labour got into power in 97 people thought that the presence of John Prescott as Deputy would ensure that Labour's roots would be kept in contact with - purely because he spoke with a regional accent, whereas anyone who had studied the man would have realised he wanted as little to do with the unions and the past of the party as possible
Yeah, I know that but it lead on to the point I wanted to make so I went with it."I think I need to clarify that I was severely taking the piss with that comment."
but he was never going to wield much influence over B&B.
Playing Devil's Advocate a teensy bit, won't every teacher get to rise a point up the pay spine, thus gaining a pay increase somewhat over 2.5%?
Vimothy - we all know that the govt is not going to give a 10% rise to anyone (including themselves) but increases in the 2% range is rubbish
not if they're at the top of their spine they won't
I'd be genuinely interested to know how many teachers are at the top of their pay spines.
I honestly think there's a sizeable minority of teachers are on a fairly easy ride, and are in the profession mainly for that reason.
In the private sector it can be quite tough to get a significant pay increase for doing the same job as you were before.