Jungle

T

thirdform

pass the sick bucket
thirdform said:
Fisher like his mentor Deleuze was hostile to the dialectic and thus like a good deleuzian could find nothing worthwhile in hip hop after it had ceased to be modernist. no room for negativity.

But a fully grounded critique of popular culture has to make room for the distasteful, the mass produced, the kitsch, in short the unpalatable.
Click to expand...

basically through the excessive formalism of innovation he ended up at an antiblack position. but all dialecticians realise that art objects specifically come to acquire their meaning in the encounter of the human with the reflection of her ideas back at them in the object. in this sense art possesses a limit, which is not merely extrinsic but intrinsic.

art objects as things in themselves if such a thing was not a limit of reason to be overcome, would merely evacuate them of content, they would contain nothing at all.

Thus even the concept of popular modernism as being discussed cannot be said to be something a priori, but precisely acquires its definite content through the synthetic method.
 
T

thirdform

pass the sick bucket
version said:
@dilbert1, @thirdform, you listened to this yet?
Click to expand...

on a hansome asian man deep house kick rn, to anger @dilbert1 's punk arse and @luka 's oasis arse, the unification of the white soulboy and anti-soulboy contingent in their love for scruffy clothes. Can't really blame Starmer for taking those free gifts can you now, probably the only worthwhile thing he did.

Will get around to listening to it, soon.

vCurious about @Corpsey 's angry reaction though. Are tim and corpse going to go to war on dissensus? Is mr oxfordshire going to be making post-dubstep war dubs?
 
dilbert1

dilbert1

Well-known member
Third straw manning me as a punk rock Deleuze-tard soulboy to enjoy his deep house (which I have no problem with) a little more
 
dilbert1

dilbert1

Well-known member
@version re: Reaper and Kloke

“Blood Pressure,” “Alienation” and “Roots & Reality” stood out as the better tracks to me. The musically phased breaks during the second half of “Havoc” I also enjoyed. Placed properly these would bang in a good set no doubt. I do prefer a less cramped arrangement and mix, it felt like nearly every track suffered from a lack of space, or else the album could have shown greater variety with regards to exercising that kind of restraint. I like more dramatic arrangements, and bolder melody. Not to say that there weren’t playful moments, but drawing things out starkly with less elements going all at once so often can make what’s there more distinguished and hopefully exciting. Not doing so can feel like a crutch on account of them individually being pale on their own. Some excellent basslines and nice break acrobatics, but per Third perhaps more over-reliance on the Amen. Overall, another relatively conservative and po-faced offering from the revivalist contingency, but less boring and more tasteful than some of their previous stuff, less of that wish wash bubbly ethereal atmos thing, which I do appreciate.
 
dilbert1

dilbert1

Well-known member
Sometimes since I primarily consume this music via Youtube as a point of first contact on a track-by-track basis (that is unless via a mix) I wonder how much the image in the video affects how I hear the music. This is a heinous example for sure, but if a track is good enough even the most goober trash imagery can be transcended. Hardly any aesthetic at all (like white label with black Times font) would be preferable to this weird Portland Oregon cozy stationary vibe
 
T

thirdform

pass the sick bucket
dilbert1 said:
Third straw manning me as a punk rock Deleuze-tard soulboy to enjoy his deep house (which I have no problem with) a little more
Click to expand...

soulboy is good, just not the oasis kind of @luka, have to go full fundamentalist and realise that phuture acid trax is the simultaneous highest culmination and end of the soulboy continuum in reciprocal measure.

Anyway...

What are the types of tattoo removal?
There are different types of tattoo removal available, including:
• Laser tattoo removal: Lasers are focused beams of light directed onto your skin. Lasers heat up the ink particles in your skin to break them down into smaller particles, which are easier for your immune system to remove. It can take multiple laser therapy sessions to remove a tattoo.
• Dermabrasion: Dermabrasion is a type of surgical procedure where a special tool removes the outer layers of your skin that contain tattoo ink. You’ll need a local or general anesthetic for this procedure. After the procedure, you’ll have an open wound on your skin that needs to heal.
• Chemical peels: Chemical peels use chemicals like trichloroacetic acid to remove permanent ink from your skin. A provider will apply the chemical to your skin, which will cause the outer layers of your skin to peel.
• Surgical excision: A surgical excision is a surgical procedure to cut out the skin that contains a tattoo. A surgeon will stitch your remaining skin together after removing the tattooed skin. This procedure works well with small tattoos and isn’t effective for large tattoos.
• Tattoo removal creams: Tattoo removal creams are available but aren’t as successful at removing tattoos as other therapies. You can use tattoo removal creams at home by rubbing the cream onto your skin where you have an unwanted tattoo. Most tattoo removal creams contain acids that can irritate or damage your skin. Tattoo removal creams work slowly, so it could take several months of regular use before you see results.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top