waffle

Banned
"In Speculative Realist terms, what is necessary is to think the in-itself of capitalism outside of any correlation to the human. Ray Brassier has already hinted at this in his original “Nihil Unbound” article on Badiou, Deleuze & Guattari and Capitalism. For surely what all analyses of capitalism have presumed to date is the capitalist ‘for-us’ (construed in positive or negative terms), whereas capital is ultimately a machine which has almost no relation to humanity whatsoever, it intersects with us, it has us as moving parts, but it ultimately is not of or for-us. Capital properly thought is a vast inhuman form, a genuinely alien life form (in that it is entirely non-organic) of which we know all-too-little. A new investigation of this form must proceed precisely as an anti-anthropomorphic cartography, a study in alien finance, a Xenoeconomics."​

Xenoeconomics and Capital Unbound



"Outside of a vitalist notion of an inhuman jouissance, (shared by the libidinal economists) the market delivers not a utopia of free-flowing desire but rather a perfect dystopia of the genuinely inhuman, a non-affective cold-machinism truly adequate to capital-in-itself. The irresistible inverse image of 9/11 presents itself: Instead of flying the planes into symbols of western capitalism, we plunge the financial-capitalistic contents of the towers into the human world itself, dissolving, sundering, shattering… "​

Post-Land: The paradoxes of a speculative realist politics

Responses to above from K-punk (first here, then here, and finally here), from Owen (here), and from No Useless Leniency (here, then here).



Responses to the Continuing Financial Meltdown and Imminent Global Depression from :

Paul Virilio, from Alan Badiou, from Tronti, from Slavoj Zizek (It's Good to Talk!!), from Jacques-Alain Miller, and lastly IT's summary of a conference on the crisis with contributions from Chris Harman, Alan Freeman, Robin Blackburn, Jacob Middleton, Alex Callinicos, and Peter Gowan.
 

nomadthethird

more issues than Time mag
"In Speculative Realist terms, what is necessary is to think the in-itself of capitalism outside of any correlation to the human. Ray Brassier has already hinted at this in his original “Nihil Unbound” article on Badiou, Deleuze & Guattari and Capitalism. For surely what all analyses of capitalism have presumed to date is the capitalist ‘for-us’ (construed in positive or negative terms), whereas capital is ultimately a machine which has almost no relation to humanity whatsoever, it intersects with us, it has us as moving parts, but it ultimately is not of or for-us. Capital properly thought is a vast inhuman form, a genuinely alien life form (in that it is entirely non-organic) of which we know all-too-little. A new investigation of this form must proceed precisely as an anti-anthropomorphic cartography, a study in alien finance, a Xenoeconomics."​

Xenoeconomics and Capital Unbound



"Outside of a vitalist notion of an inhuman jouissance, (shared by the libidinal economists) the market delivers not a utopia of free-flowing desire but rather a perfect dystopia of the genuinely inhuman, a non-affective cold-machinism truly adequate to capital-in-itself. The irresistible inverse image of 9/11 presents itself: Instead of flying the planes into symbols of western capitalism, we plunge the financial-capitalistic contents of the towers into the human world itself, dissolving, sundering, shattering… "​

Post-Land: The paradoxes of a speculative realist politics

Responses to above from K-punk (first here, then here, and finally here), from Owen (here), and from No Useless Leniency (here, then here).



Responses to the Continuing Financial Meltdown and Imminent Global Depression from :

Paul Virilio, from Alan Badiou, from Tronti, from Slavoj Zizek (It's Good to Talk!!), from Jacques-Alain Miller, and lastly IT's summary of a conference on the crisis with contributions from Chris Harman, Alan Freeman, Robin Blackburn, Jacob Middleton, Alex Callinicos, and Peter Gowan.


I've been following this on the blogs, but thanks for posting the links to the responses by Virilio, et al!
 

version

Well-known member
Every so often it hits me how mental it is that some of this stuff's now a recognised thing with coverage in the mainstream press and Silicon Valley billionaires talking about it.
 

version

Well-known member
"In Speculative Realist terms, what is necessary is to think the in-itself of capitalism outside of any correlation to the human. Ray Brassier has already hinted at this in his original “Nihil Unbound” article on Badiou, Deleuze & Guattari and Capitalism. For surely what all analyses of capitalism have presumed to date is the capitalist ‘for-us’ (construed in positive or negative terms), whereas capital is ultimately a machine which has almost no relation to humanity whatsoever, it intersects with us, it has us as moving parts, but it ultimately is not of or for-us. Capital properly thought is a vast inhuman form, a genuinely alien life form (in that it is entirely non-organic) of which we know all-too-little. A new investigation of this form must proceed precisely as an anti-anthropomorphic cartography, a study in alien finance, a Xenoeconomics."​

Xenoeconomics and Capital Unbound

"Outside of a vitalist notion of an inhuman jouissance, (shared by the libidinal economists) the market delivers not a utopia of free-flowing desire but rather a perfect dystopia of the genuinely inhuman, a non-affective cold-machinism truly adequate to capital-in-itself. The irresistible inverse image of 9/11 presents itself: Instead of flying the planes into symbols of western capitalism, we plunge the financial-capitalistic contents of the towers into the human world itself, dissolving, sundering, shattering… "​

Post-Land: The paradoxes of a speculative realist politics

The links for these two were dead, but they've been archived.


 

luka

Well-known member
yeah its really interesting trying to figure out how big a part it's playing in the whole thing.
 

version

Well-known member
yeah its really interesting trying to figure out how big a part it's playing in the whole thing.

One issue in teasing it apart is the dilution of the term into shorthand for 'manufacturing chaos', e.g. the racist usage where neo-Nazis talk about a strategy of tension sort of thing designed to bring about a race war.
 

version

Well-known member

This blog is awful. I can see why the posts were deleted.

"... a continuation and merging of both Marxist-Leninist Communism and Neo-liberal capitalism,"

"What is necessary (breaking with Deleuze) is to utilise the stuctures of capitalism against the state, in an entirely terroristic fashion, so as to transform the very nature of the nightmarish Lovecraftian creature itself."

audiophile-audiophool.gif
 

luka

Well-known member
So embaressing. Kpunk cut off good influences like me craner and fat jim to make common cause with josef k and "splintering bone ashes"
 

version

Well-known member
This stuff feels more dated than the CCRU gear from over a decade before. Same with Cyclonopedia. It's Nick Land and k-punk without the energy or charisma. The whole Lovecraftian capitalism thing, talking about waging guerilla and terroristic warfare, is so ridiculous too. They never say what that would actually look like. It's all abstractions and pronouncements. "We must... !".
 

version

Well-known member
Mark's response completely pulls it apart and the SBA follow up's just noise.

The question of what form the praxis necessary to destabilise the current state-capital bond has already been answered in part- a kind of meta-terrorism, operating on the plane of capital itself (ideally, in the conception which has obsessed me for some time, in the form of a capitalist surrealism, the exploitation of credit based financial systems for their primary destructive potential. This destruction is not merely to be thought on the ability to trigger vast crashes, which is readily apparent, but further their capacity to destabilise the consistency of value itself). That this consists in taking more seriously the claims of finance capital than even its own agents is the very point itself, and is in a sense an actualisation of Lyotard's gestures towards a 'nihilist theory of credit'. Further we might conceptualise the collective forms necessary to actualise this praxis as being very much in the mode of the kind of Maoist party delineated by Badiou in Théorie du Sujet, an institutional actor capable of allowing the ephemeral vanishing term of history (now surrealist avant-capital, rather than the proletariat of course) to cohere, for as long as required to enable it to achieve the absolute dissolution of all structuration, including itself.​
🤪
 

version

Well-known member
Did Noys ever post on here? Him, Mark and Owen's responses are miles better than the initial SBA posts. Much more clear sighted.
 

Clinamenic

Binary & Tweed
Every so often it hits me how mental it is that some of this stuff's now a recognised thing with coverage in the mainstream press and Silicon Valley billionaires talking about it.
Totally, and in San Francisco, everyone and their mother self-identifies as <fill_in_the_blank>/acc, its bloated out into a trend largely consisting of conceptual cosmetics.
 
Top