He means that the fact that the name sounds geeky is entirely appropriate (i.e. dubstep is geeky). Which I think is true of a lot of the ‘scene’ / punters, and some fringe producers, but not at all of the central crews
He means that the fact that the name sounds geeky is entirely appropriate (i.e. dubstep is geeky). Which I think is true of a lot of the ‘scene’ / punters, and some fringe producers, but not at all of the central crews
I'm normally really anti the whole scene elitism / "kids on the dancefloor don't know what's good for them" attitude, but the wobbleification of dubstep is really making me think an awful lot of people shouldn't be allowed anywhere near a nightclub.To me this fully explains dubstep's creative stagnation despite its increased fanbase, and grime's new vitality despite being considered "washed up" by a lot of people not directly involved in it.
The difference between dubstep "youngers" and grime youngers are that the new dubsteppers seem to be entirely content with idol worship and the way things are while grime youngers want to take over, change and challenge the game.
To me this fully explains dubstep's creative stagnation despite its increased fanbase, and grime's new vitality despite being considered "washed up" by a lot of people not directly involved in it.
erm, are you basing that on anything other than 6 or 7 idiots on dubstep forum?
superimposing the words of 0.00005% of the scene 'youngers' onto everyone else is not a good look
No, I'm basing it on the blatantly huge demand for dubstep in its present form, which is inarguably the result of a lot of newcomers judging by the size of the crowds at dubstep raves now.
There seems to be a difference now, though, that a lot of people who got into dubstep a few years ago had neophile tendancies and were feeling it because of the variety and depth of the sound as well as the weight, and would really go mental if a DJ played something totally different and off the wall. There are still a lot of people like that getting into it, but there are also a lot of people with more conservative tastses who just want to hear a succession of increasingly heavy wobbles each dropping the same way all night and feel cheated if the DJ's mix it up a bit or play something deeper and more meditative. It's not so much about lack of knowledge as having a ridiculously blinkered view of what dubstep should be.well, yes, there is huge demand for dubstep now... and there didn't used to be... so current popularity must be down to new listeners. self-evident truth. some of them like grime, some of them don't.
so what exactly are you saying? how could it possibly be otherwise? when you started listening to dubstep, had you the same knowledge of the genre as those who'd been into it for five years?
well, yes, there is huge demand for dubstep now... and there didn't used to be... so current popularity must be down to new listeners. self-evident truth. some of them like grime, some of them don't.
so what exactly are you saying? how could it possibly be otherwise? when you started listening to dubstep, had you the same knowledge of the genre as those who'd been into it for five years?