nomadologist said:
HMLT's hypocrisy here is just funny to me--some drugs are ok (the ones that have met with the status quo's approval) and their negative effects on health can be overlooked [tobacco] while others are evil, "chemical death sentences" that only a completely decadent degenerate would do [cocaine, heroin, LSD].
That is a
gross misrepresentation of everything I have actually said.
I never said any such thing about any drug being 'ok'. Where the fuck did you read any of this?
Look, nomad, this is a serious fucking issue, so stop trying to score cheap, dumb 'points' my resorting to such disingenuous misrepresentations; leave that to the Vimothy's and Tea's.
I was -
completely accurately - pointing out the sheer inconsistency evident on this forum by those posters demanding that hard drugs be legalized while simultaneously defending the banning of soft drugs. Such hypocrisy is informed by sheer narcissistic
egoism, not by any consistent or informed social policy. And it is totally self-defeating: do you imagine it will now be easier to have hard drugs decriminalized/legalized? [this is somewhat directly analogous to those on poor, non-unionized pay demanding the abolition of, expressing hostility towards, all trade unions because unionized workers secure higher pay and better work conditions - something that is happening everywhere in the West]
All drugs - even caffeine - have negative health effects, every dog in the street knows that, yet you seek to insinuate that I don't know this. Well fuck you, Nomad. Face up to
your hypocrisy, and stop maliciously falsifying what I say here.
It is you who is defending the
status quo here: the purely self-centred hedonistic threadmill.