This, in my opinion, is why the Hilary stuff gets traction. People feel instinctively repulsed by a woman who stays with someone who is not merely a philanderer but a sexual predator of the highest order. And it's natural to ask what exactly is the nature of this pact? And into that space, (the open question, the mystery) all sorts of goblins and ghouls rush in.
I've noticed this too. You get people on the left talking about Trump and Epstein then someone who supports Trump will appear saying "What about Bill Clinton?" thinking it's some Gotcha moment and everyone goes "Go after him too. Go after all of them" but when you flip it the other way the Trump supporters only ever want to talk about Clinton.
I think there's some truth to the idea that some famous couples are together as a business arrangement.
is there any proof this happened, or is it circulating because it sounds good and hey why not!
is there any proof this happened, or is it circulating because it sounds good and hey why not!
Do you mean is it true that the camera malfunctioned, or that the camera "malfunctioned", i.e. didn't malfunction?
The 'conspiracy' is structural and simple. The rich and powerful will act with impunity and do whatever the fuck they want to become more rich and powerful - until we march them to the guillotine.
And also that, unsurprisingly, those who have singlemindedly sought out power (and those who were born into it), are obsessed with power itself, and that interest so often gets sexualised as predatory behaviour against the vulnerable. By which I mean, because of the way the world works, Epstein could have had as much sex as he wanted with beautiful adult women/men, but he chose to abuse underage girls.