You just don't like it because it's critical of a new-age conspiracy theorist who loves drugs and The Matrix.Very ugly, spiteful and underwritten article. Feel cheapened by having read it tbh.
yes, clearly that's part of it. I don't like setting up 'the schizo-typal character' as a freak to be mocked and patronised.
I wasn’t responding to your question I was following from my own post
What would you like to talk about?
You always say that when someone says something obviously true that you can't actually argue against!Oh come on, that's tedious cliche
Trump captured a huge swathe of these people in a way that is unprecedented. Not by design, or not completely by design,but it happened.
I didn't get any sense of mockery, really. The author seems, if anything, to feel sorry for him. You can spin that as being patronising, if you wish, I suppose.yes, clearly that's part of it. I don't like setting up 'the schizo-typal character' as a freak to be mocked and patronised.