version
Well-known member
I was poor. Once on my birthday, my old man, he showed me a picture of a cake. I sat there all day trying to blow out the candles.
I was poor. Once on my birthday, my old man, he showed me a picture of a cake. I sat there all day trying to blow out the candles.
I never got a birthday cake.
Yeah, I was going to say - there was always loads of explosions, bullets flying everywhere and whatnot, but nobody - not even the baddies - ever seemed to suffer so much as a scratch.Nobody ever got hit by a butllet though (apart from that one episode where Howling Mad Murdoch was injured and that was the plot).
it's both which is the only reason you're botheringIt's from 2006. This is historical research not mindless entertainment
Also sitcoms in the US... Friends, Seinfeld whatever they all good flats in central NY despite never doing anything. More recently you've got those things like Kevin Can Wait and Last Man Standing were you get an average to bad looking every man who gets to do fuck all and live in a big house with his beautiful wife - just the normal life that every workig man has.There was a thread on Twitter from an Englishman about Hollywood representations of 'normal middle class homes' point being they're all colossal mansions
you just need to look at any UK sitcom to see that most people live in squalor, long tradition of this from steptoe through young ones/bottom to the present dayAlso sitcoms in the US... Friends, Seinfeld whatever they all good flats in central NY despite never doing anything. More recently you've got those things like Kevin Can Wait and Last Man Standing were you get an average to bad looking every man who gets to do fuck all and live in a big house with his beautiful wife - just the normal life that every workig man has.
God, can you imagine Americans watching Bottom?you just need to look at any UK sitcom to see that most people live in squalor, long tradition of this from steptoe through young ones/bottom to the present day
Well I'm saying it shifted to the studios, woops is saying it shifted away from them. Maybe it's not totally contradictory if they happened at different times.The two things aren't contradictory are they?
Yeah but the narrative of Raging Bulls etc is that cos of Heaven's Gate and a few other films auteurs were seen as too much of a risk and the studio curbed them despite the success (almost failures) of Godfather etc so it moved to a more kinda democratic or rule by committee type process without one artistic person who didn't care about the bottom line more than everything else, having massive power. Later on it probably moved further from the studios to their backers and investors, I dunno.both, i think. but the 70s had the auteur directors, coppola, kubrick whoever
Sorry I see what you mean. I think in the 70s you got those auteurs Kubrick, Cimino whatever and sometimes they made profitable masterpieces but sometimes they fucked up and afterwards the studios decided to concentrate on guaranteed money makers and curbed the excesses of the geniuses.no i'm not i'm saying there was a window in the 70s where directors had more control than the studio system for a while but what do i know
and that's 'cos it's about a macho misanthrope, not a rebel without a cause or an action hero or a psycho but an (apparently) intelligent man who repeatedly rejects polite society. there must be a name for this kind of flickcould only ever have been made in the 70s