I think she's selling her own book.yeah its funny but bratty college kids pointing and laughing at the freaks is not really good is it
It's more fun when we're all just screaming at each other and talking at cross-purposes though, isn't it?you could of just joined in with me there, ganged up on biscuits and had him confess that hes just the same as us. he goes with a vague gut instinct which is formed from a few news sources, his peers, and some random websites.
Category error here, mate. I'm not even talking about the science. I'm talking about the ethics of a health policy that would lead to huge numbers of people dying or being seriously injured because of some dodgy 19th century ideal of social Darwinism.Science-denier!
no. its most fun when we all gang up on someone for a group bullying session. you could have joined in when i shouted bundle.It's more fun when we're all just screaming at each other and talking at cross-purposes though, isn't it?
Oxford's I guess, as it's a trad vaccine rather than an mRNA noveltymixed biscuit if you HAD to take a vaccine, which one would it be?
Sorry, a scientist said it and it's about science, you inveterate science-denier.Category error here, mate. I'm not even talking about the science. I'm talking about the ethics of a health policy that would lead to huge numbers of people dying or being seriously injured because of some dodgy 19th century ideal of social Darwinism.
But you accept that, ceteris paribus, more people catching it would mean more people dying from it? I mean, that seems inevitable, right? What argument could possibly make that untrue?Sorry, a scientist said it and it's about science, you inveterate science-denier.
As Rio would say, you've been Mercked
Dennis Quaid driving through your bloodstream Little Priest. Get into it.
I feel like you're deliberately not getting the point.I'm deferring to the scientists on this, as should you.
It's not up to us to divine their mysterious ways.
Better than Randy