mixed_biscuits
_________________________
That page makes sense when using winter data, not summer data (when the tests will pick up a great proportion of lapsed infections)
Superior in what sense? Some people might say that catching a virus that can kill you or make you seriously ill is a downside of the "catching the virus to become immune to it" approach.This is typical of futile attempts to put everything in the same category.
I wonder if Merck recently announcing that natural infection is superior to the vaccine counts as 'conspiracy theory'
Well I haven't looked at their paper - maybe they have good evidence to say that catching the virus offers better protection against future infections than (one or some of the many) vaccines.Wait, hang on, Merck are the scientists and you're denying the inherent truth of their statement...are you a science denier?
why cant you understand even the most simple and straightfoward of logical arguments? youve got the brain of a peasant from the dark agesThe interactions in these last couple of pages are pretty wild.