the story goes that when yeltsin got the tanks out against the russian parliament and comms were cut off, the girlfriend of one guy who ran a very early indie internet provider who i vaguely know got a call in the middle of the night "Er hallo this is NATO, we heard you can put us in contact with USSR"It was 24 hour news before, and before that it was the radio.
I was working in the Virgin Megastore in Piccadilly Circus during 9/11, and we got updates from people walking in with the latest editions of the Evening Standard.
shut up swotdo you stand by the last comma? im not sure it needs to be there.
Problem is I suppose, do you want to bet the future of this world on Putin not being that crazy?Putin may be an arsehole but I don't think he's insane. He'd have no justification for going nuclear unless Russian targets were attacked in Russia, I think.
Moreover, I just find it pretty depressing to think that he simply has to be allowed to get away with whatever he wants because he's a bully. And appeasement doesn't end well, if you look at historical precedent.
"There were unacceptable statements about possible conflict situations and even confrontations and clashes between Nato and Russa. I will not name the authors of these statements, although it was the British foreign secretary"
Mainly Liz Truss.Yeah, to be fair Liz Truss makes me want to nuke stuff sometimes.
And indeed we are so witnessingmight be about to witness the collapse of the rouble here
Yeah that's my concernIt's a war with existential aims and risks. It has not been started and is not being conducted on a rational basis.
The Ides of March?
It would be just typical if nuclear war broke out on my birthday.