Perhaps a trivial comparison, but the Tories pull the same trick when anyone stands up to them. Any criticism is labeled anti-Conservative bias and beyond the pale.One of the things that I'm finding mentally tiring about parsing this situation is the weirdly asymmetric worldview that Kremlin mouthpieces use to maintain a tone of innocent victimhood. So for instance, if some Russian troops are hanging out on the outskirts of Kyiv lobbing vacuum bombs at apartment blocks then that's just the good and natural order of things, but if some American F22s flew over the Ukraine and bombed said troops then that would be a clear and unprovoked act of aggression. Similarly with this strike on the fuel depot today, there's a sense that Russia have decided that this is a war where they attack stuff in the Ukraine, and for Ukrainians to start attacking stuff in Russia is clearly against the rules and hence unacceptable.
I often hear different stuff compared to an abusive / controlling partner - always framing stuff as the victim's fault for "provoking" them, "now look what you made me do", all that sort of stuff. And I dunno, it sometimes feels a bit pat but it does also seem to fit pretty neatly in this case.Perhaps a trivial comparison, but the Tories pull the same trick when anyone stands up to them. Any criticism is labeled anti-Conservative bias and beyond the pale.
Probably the first war (that people in affluent parts of the world care about, anyway) in the era of modern meme mass-culture, in which memes are playing a significant role, but memes are just the latest iteration - or part of the latest iteration, anyway - of information warfare, which is as old as warfare itself, i.e. the Trojan Horse, "all war is based on deception", etcUkraine's meme game is on point. This could be the first war won with memes.
I often hear different stuff compared to an abusive / controlling partner - always framing stuff as the victim's fault for "provoking" them, "now look what you made me do", all that sort of stuff. And I dunno, it sometimes feels a bit pat but it does also seem to fit pretty neatly in this case.
Perhaps a trivial comparison, but the Tories pull the same trick when anyone stands up to them. Any criticism is labeled anti-Conservative bias and beyond the pale.
Inside job by Russia to justify imminent shock and awe attack for which apparently retreating troops are clearing the sceneOne of the things that I'm finding mentally tiring about parsing this situation is the weirdly asymmetric worldview that Kremlin mouthpieces use to maintain a tone of innocent victimhood. So for instance, if some Russian troops are hanging out on the outskirts of Kyiv lobbing vacuum bombs at apartment blocks then that's just the good and natural order of things, but if some American F22s flew over the Ukraine and bombed said troops then that would be a clear and unprovoked act of aggression. Similarly with this strike on the fuel depot today, there's a sense that Russia have decided that this is a war where they attack stuff in the Ukraine, and for Ukrainians to start attacking stuff in Russia is clearly against the rules and hence unacceptable.
I agree exactly, and the battered wife thing had occurred to me too, with regards to some of the apologetics I've seen in the last month.I often hear different stuff compared to an abusive / controlling partner - always framing stuff as the victim's fault for "provoking" them, "now look what you made me do", all that sort of stuff. And I dunno, it sometimes feels a bit pat but it does also seem to fit pretty neatly in this case.
didnt they also jack up interest rates? also the signaling that russia will only accept roubles for energy ccould be another cause besides just sanctions.perverse after effect of sanctions: demand for roubles goes down due to sanctions and up due to second order after effects of sanctions on commodity prices, netting out at zero or thereabouts