shakahislop
Well-known member
the entanglement of genuinely progressive forces and commercial reality tends to create outputs which are a bit sullied, things that are less clear cut
I suppose though those guys are just wankers, they happen to be wankers who are talking about sexuality, but that's incidental to them generally being wankers. Sexuality is just the prism through they choose to express their wankerness. In a sense they don't belong in this thread, they just superficially look as though they do.But surely you can see that this is a totally different thing from what Rich is talking about, i.e. club promoters who are straight themselves cancelling a booking on realising that a DJ they'd assumed was gay in fact wasn't gay, when it was for a night that wasn't specifically gay in a club that (notionally, at least) isn't specifically gay? That doesn't even make sense from a 'diversity' POV, since by the sound of it they go out of their way to book gay performers all the time.
I've always loved Jamiroquai so I'm shocked and saddened to see this cultural appropriation. Your heroes always let you down in the end I guess.
it's the same for a lot of strident identity-based stuff. you have to learn to sift out what is motivated by something genuine from people using it as an excuse to take someone down a peg or two, lash out, assert superiority, all the other emotional things that happen between people / expressions of wankerness. this stuff is very much part of the social world i'm in so i've had to figure it out.I suppose though those guys are just wankers, they happen to be wankers who are talking about sexuality, but that's incidental to them generally being wankers. Sexuality is just the prism through they choose to express their wankerness. In a sense they don't belong in this thread, they just superficially look as though they do.
Do you remember years ago when someone claimed those PG Tips ads with the monkeys were racist?I think an awful lot of accusations of racism (and other -isms) come from unexamined assumptions that are themselves racist. A common form these accusations take is something along the line of "I automatically associate the negative traits you're talking about with black people, therefore you are raciqllqst."
You can easily swap "working-class" for "black" and "a horrible snob" for "racist."
partly cos non-binary didn't exist as a term back then. a straight white (& narcissistic) dj can now announce they're non-binary and use it to get press/attention/victim status without having to change a single thing about themselves other than getting a weird haircut. it's so shameless lol.I'd be interested to see how lineups break down demographically today compared to 10 or 20 years ago. I'm sure you'd see a lot more women, nonbinary people, trans people, people of colour etc being given a platform but I'd guess that white, male and / or straight people still make up the bulk in most places.
The thing is, all the comments will be "they're not a proper dj, they're just pressing buttons - a real DJ uses VINYL and is too busy mixing to dance around like this fool" - but of course these comments are made by bitter old gits who haven't been near a club in twenty years so they are utterly irrelevant.specifically the approach that emerged in the late 2010s of recording DJ sets with a static camera directly, unflinchingly on the DJ's face and body, has made the dj's physicality (the way they move, dance, smile, as well as their gender and appearance) a lot more important for getting those streams
I guess it's like almost anything else, being handsome/pretty is never a disadvantage.The camera point's a good one - don't think anyone serious would argue that "pretty privilege" is equivalent to structural inequality, but DJs today do generally seem to prioritise certain aesthetics and approaches to self-promotion, which create their own homogeneity even if things are more diverse otherwise.
I wonder how many people really do that though.partly cos non-binary didn't exist as a term back then. a straight white (& narcissistic) dj can now announce they're non-binary and use it to get press/attention/victim status without having to change a single thing about themselves other than getting a weird haircut. it's so shameless lol.
likewise straight white guys putting on eyeliner and calling themselves queer. desperate to be defined out of the straight/white/male category because of the oppressor status it signifies in the identity-obsessed art/music world.
I don't, but I can all too easily imagine it, and it's just the kind of thing I'm talking about. I assume the accusers were, shall we say, not over-endowed in the melanin department?Do you remember years ago when someone claimed those PG Tips ads with the monkeys were racist?
it's the fact that those categories are so loosely defined that I'm getting at, and the reason for thatI wonder how many people really do that though.
This isnt about "Kode 9" or LTJ Bukem not being "coded as black" @thirdform , it's about paying crowds flocking towards line-ups that reflect a more diverse society
Loads of discussion about this seems weirdly misplaced, music journos, "class", NTS (!)
If increased diversity in line-ups wasn't making money it wouldn't be happening
the entanglement of genuinely progressive forces and commercial reality tends to create outputs which are a bit sullied, things that are less clear cut