So those 73 virgins will retain their modesty.
of course. A new age for the second sex, like I said on the other page.
So those 73 virgins will retain their modesty.
It could harm a man's mental health, but I just don't know what harms it would do.
Your failure to sterilise suggests that this inclination to spawn a family is a demand-side problem rather than supply-side.of course. A new age for the second sex, like I said on the other page.
Your failure to sterilise suggests that this inclination to spawn a family is a demand-side problem rather than supply-side.
no, I have invented a new islamic calvinist synthesis, which women find even hotter than male lesbianism.
Huh? Can you explain?You're more culturally black than you are culturally feminine.
What would the criticism of weapons be? Sounds interesting.Oh sure you can criticise them, but the criticised doesn't need to pay any attention to their critics. You remain trapped in the weapon of criticism, without arriving at the criticism of weapons.
You can only contravene the manosphere through force.
Hello?! The rapping!Huh? Can you explain?
Again, feminists don't actually think men are irredeemable. That would be essentialist feminism and I am an anti-essentialist.You can't imagine that men that already have poor mental health would be further incentivized just to give up or end their life due to being told they are irredeemable?
Your feelings are valid. If you think feminist messaging is so important, why don't you just be a feminist yourself and come up with better messaging? That's what I did.I guess you don't believe that the messaging could cause men to feel that way?
I accept that feminism comes accross this way to a lot of people, my question is just how important is mean messaging? Not more important than the fight against the patriarchy.Are you saying that you don't believe that is how modern feminism has come across to me?
Not sure what you mean here.Or that it doesn't matter because outside of my experiences in the real world "in academia real feminism is"
How would anyone do that? This is a culture war, not a military war. So strange how a Marxist claims every social change must happen as a result of violence rather than you know, changes in the material conditions of production.
What about my unconditional pussy eating, sensuality, sensitivity and collectivism? That all doesn't make me culturally feminineHello?! The rapping!
Good point, but by emphasizing violence over material conditions, aren't you abandoning Marxism and becoming more of a political realist?Changes in the material conditions of production are violent! have you ever seen a peaceful change in the material conditions of production? Even your democratic socialism rests on the US funding itself through wars and the arms sector, otherwise, the value of the dollar would completely devalue. Even American cultural exports only have the hegemony they do through the US being world military superpower. Otherwise they would just be as quaint as Ethiopian culture.
Maybe, but you do a lot of rapping.What about my unconditional pussy eating, sensuality, sensitivity and collectivism? That all doesn't make me culturally feminine
Not nice! Language mister! Why are you guys so mean anyway? This whole board is like a prison where the inmates constantly abuse each other.Honestly what a cunt
Good point, but by emphasizing violence over material conditions, aren't you abandoning Marxism and becoming more of a political realist?
Political realism isn't necessarily democratic either.no because marxism is not democratic. Your universities in the imperial core will continue to prostitute Marxism though.
Political realism isn't necessarily democratic either.
This whole board is like a prison where the inmates constantly abuse each other.
my question is just how important is mean messaging? Not more important than the fight against the patriarchy.