mixed_biscuits
_________________________
See, you can't stop yourself.
The Feminine Perspective against the Manosphere
- Thread starter ?!..!?
- Start date
-
- Tags
- a bunch of trolls trolling each other aesthetic jihad chicks dig guys with money cia lesbian david lesbian do you tongue punch the dirt star? dolezal1977 eating pussy without asking everyone on this board is a troll extraterrestrial bisexual feminist travis bickle justified ancients of noncing lesbian separatism luka's crop top malelesbian: english rp boy toy malethespian mansplaining feminism mr tea confirmed pegging freak mrs tea eaten out 24/7 prevent prevent! sarlacc pit taking the filth the art of trolling the feminonce massive the perils of self-publishing the viper of cunnilingus undisciplined lockerroom pussy eating unimaginable anguish version's throbbing penis
Why should I care? I've already refuted your arguments and you had no response.
mixed_biscuits
_________________________
Subtle difference: you disagreed with them; you not only failed to refute them but you also started refuting your own arguments...in the same post
mixed_biscuits
_________________________
@malelesbian awarding himself a medal, no bias involved
mixed_biscuits
_________________________
And you said you don't care that you're not a thinker rather than a drone - that's pretty telling
Well I'm sure you can explain why, right? So do it.
I'm a drone but you're a troll among trolls. A whole board full of trolls considers you the biggest troll. Maybe that would be an accomplishment if it weren't so pathetic.
mixed_biscuits
_________________________
Maybe get your ducks in order so that you aren't disagreeing with yourself within the space of one post first?
mixed_biscuits
_________________________
The only reason you're feeling got-at is because your arguments are very get-at-able; go back to the drawing board and you'll meet with more success
mixed_biscuits
_________________________
@malelesbian look at how eg. terms like 'sex', 'gender', 'essentialism' are defined and used in other disciplines beyond your niche of interest; most people don't live on planet malelesbian
mixed_biscuits
_________________________
In fact, I think only one person lives on planet malelesbian...
Mr. Tea
Let's Talk About Ceps
@mixed_biscuits @malelesbian I have to say, I'm gutted that you're both so busy laying into each other that you've missed my hilarious jibe here.
mixed_biscuits
_________________________
Gawd, another one giving themselves a medal
Why don't you read Butler or any feminism or gender theory at all? I don't think it's controversial to accept the definition of gender provided by gender theory.
mixed_biscuits
_________________________
a) I have read some b) of course it's controversial: not least because you don't accept its implications for transracialism, among other things...even you find it controversial when it's applied beyond the cliche!
Do you know what exegetical scorekeeping is? It's a bad argument familiar to most academic philosophers. When you're just looking for inconsistencies and contradictions in your opponent's argument rather than actually giving a counter-argument, that's exegetical score-keeping. And the majority of academic philosophers consider it a bad, uncharitable argument. But then I wouldn't be suprised if you don't know what interpretative charity is either.
But again I refuted your argument for transracialism. It relies on an equivocation between cultural identity and race. You never responded to that argument.
mixed_biscuits
_________________________
Disagreed with, not refuted; stop giving yourself medals
mixed_biscuits
_________________________
The problem is that you're not philosophical enough to accept abstraction that moves beyond that with which you're familiar. You're basically a conservative but stuck in a superficially 'progressive' niche worldview