The other big problem with moral authority is that it would basically require everything in Gaza/WB since 67 to have not happened
That ship has sailed
They should have resisted the poisoned apple in 67 but it was too tempting
I don't disagree about the basic error, but it's much more realistic for the U.S. to have avoided it. That specific error is pretty much baked into Israeli policy at a like subatomic level.
I'll check out that article, but I have to imagine that has been the case for literally every international order ever created
Westphalia, Congress of Vienna, Bretton Woods, whatever
If you, again, see that for many Israeli leaders since 67 and certainly this govt, the ultimate survival or Israel is directly tied to the denial of a Palestinian state, their actions make more sense
Name me a single occasion when someone from a powerful country has been convicted of war crimes by an international criminal court
Name me a single occasion when international law and institutions have stopped a major power from going to war and/or oppressing its own citizens as it sees fit
And it goes back well before Netanyahu tbc
Deterrence thru overwhelming reprisal and collective punishment have always been Israeli policy. Deir Yassin, Al-Dawayima, etc in 48 (which did have some Arab counter-massacres tho not nearly as as many). The attritional border raiding of the 50s and...
Due respect, this entire line of reasoning exists in a fantasy world that has Israeli leadership acting exactly opposite from the way it always has previously. It also supposes the countries care about international institutions in and of themselves rather than as lip service (which is still...
The point the author ends with is that for all the wild rhetoric about wiping Hamas off the face of the earth, it's unlikely to happen as long as Netanyahu is in power bc they're essentially partners in preventing any peace solution
One very important thing to note is that any gains Hamas has made are a direct result of Netanyahu's longrunning policy of deliberately strengthening Hamas and weakening the Palestinian Authority/Fatah, as well as keeping the two divided, in order to undermine a two-state solution.
It's...
Not really, no. Or, it depends what is meant by "military power". It's definitely possible Hamas leadership was looking at the inevitable response as an opportunity to show it's stepped up to the level of Hezbollah, i.e. can fight the IDF to a draw in prepared positions on its own ground, but...
Speaking of which, Netanyahu, Gallant, and the IDF commander for southern Israel all made public statements today heavily implying that invasion is coming soon
Could just be more posturing, but if Hamas leadership isn't going to blink over the siege (and it doesn't seem like they will) and the...
Yall ffs pls stop taking the bait. In every thread. All he ever wants is for you to establish a position so he can "ah but what about -this-? checkmate liberals" in a recursive loop of endlessly moving goalposts. If there's a serious question or argument I'll answer it, the rest it's best to...
Everywhere I look we're redoing all the same arguments from 2002
This one is the "we're better than them so we can do bad stuff and not live up to our own supposed standards in order to win and it's justified bc we're better than them" tautology. Whence the CIA torture program etc.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.