Search results

I'm glad we tend to agree on that, but indulge the thoroughness. There is something to be said for it, no?

Is the abstract expression of libido guided by fantasy? The internal and simulated promise of reward, allowing the build up of such energies? Does the so-called "reality principle" refer to the perceived shared reality that must be reckoned with in order to achieve fulfillment? If not for such...

If we think about this from a position of evolutionary biology and physiological function and necessity, libido becomes something of a spandrel once artificial (which is to say nature-via-human-willed, rather than merely nature-willed, so to speak) means of reproduction become viable. Do we have...

Kinda want to do a brief taxonomy here, just to calibrate our understandings. As I use it, "libido" is largely synonymous with terms like vitality, energy, life force, passion potential, etc. Average all those together, and we have the basic idea. Perhaps it is best to think of it as an energy...

That is, would that be the political dimension of neoliberalism, here considered as the vaunting of the minimally regulated economy as its own end?

Is a neoliberal political view based on lobbyists having influence over policymakers?

Ha!

https://www.ancestry.com/genealogy/records/naomi-cannibal-24-2p5xp63

Exactly one human with surname "Cannibal" residing in NY, according to Ancestry. https://www.ancestry.com/name-origin?surname=cannibal

Same.

Just trying to illustrate that on certain scientific levels, on certain orders of physical scale undaunted by say children's rights, stuff like this is seemingly commonplace.

I mean as silly as it sounds, there could be something to it. The cosmos is certainly complex enough. Maybe the production of certain blood cells is heightened within some age range, and maybe the reintroduction of such a heightened proportion of certain cells has some kind of rejuvenating...

Alexander Bogdanov did this, apparently. He was the guy behind proletkult, but I forget the exact historical situation. Anyway he was this avant-garde communist scientist. Hematology, systems theory (believe he called it tektology). Anyway I think he died due to complications involving blood...

Funny, I just got through the cyberspace bit when I thought "alright I get the gist" and I was actually gonna respond to you by saying he didn;t sound totalitarian enough.

Its all compatible, seemingly, is what I'm saying. There are just so many sides to it, that voicing each one sounds like an individual thesis.

I mean I think a cartel of corporations can act as a de facto oligarchy, with the political sphere gravitating around it.

Yeah I really ought to become familiar with this guy.

My got!

Thats the thing, I think its still just dawning.