In fact this is the fundamental problem with western democratic systems isn't it? That the system picks people who are good at winning elections rather than those who are good at running a country. I don't really see any particular reason why those two things should be correlated. So now I think about it a bit more, it seems pretty likely that any leader is gonna be a ninja in the PR/winning bit and it's pretty much fifty-fifty whether they turn out to be good at running things or not. So I reckon the contradiction you identified is in fact likely to be what's going on about half of the time, before we even talk about individuals, purely cos of the way the system is set up.it's quite possible that he's good at one thing (PR) and bad at another thing (running a country etc)
Boris and trump have been anything but incompetent when it comes to what is important to them. They've been incredibly successful.
Someone was saying the other day that they're casting NHS workers as soldiers on the front line so they can paint the deaths as noble sacrifices rather than fuck ups on their part in not providing enough equipment.
are democrats and labour capable of being that cleverly dark and deceitful? it seems fundamentally against their nature, but if the ends justify the means then I kind of wish they'd occasionally be dark evil tacticians.
are democrats and labour capable of being that cleverly dark and deceitful? it seems fundamentally against their nature, but if the ends justify the means then I kind of wish they'd occasionally be dark evil tacticians.
Have you seen the oil price?
It's negative.
Dear Russia, dear independent Scotland, any comment?