alex

Do not read this.
glad switzerland have scored to be honest, spain have been hyped way too much & torres is dead to me.
 

crackerjack

Well-known member
they defended well. but really, there's no point bemoaning a dull world cup then celebrating when anti-football wins out over the proper stuff
 

baboon2004

Darned cockwombles.
they defended well. but really, there's no point bemoaning a dull world cup then celebrating when anti-football wins out over the proper stuff

true - when giant-killing is carried out by dull teams (greece, 2004), it's no good for the game, and everyone bemoans it after. only when it's won by good footballing sides does it become interesting (eg Turkey in 2002, though they didn't kill any giants, rather just progressed way further than expected).

now things get really interesting, and chile-switzerland begins to assume an importance way above expected. Switzerland draw, and they're odds on to win the group, plunging Spain into a second round clash with Brazil that could be the biggest second round match in footabll history.
 

baboon2004

Darned cockwombles.
put http://www.vuvuzela-time.co.uk/ in front of any website address (leaving off the http bit).

until this afternoon, the vuvuzela has easily been the story of the world cup.

2nd round predictions (why not)

Mexico v South Korea
Argentina v South Africa
England v Ghana
Germany v USA
Netherlands v Paraguay
Italy v Denmark
Brazil v Switzerland
Chile v Ivory Coast

(Chile-Spain draw, Chile beat Switz, everyone beats Honduras)

What's the rcord for most non-European teams in the last 16? (ok, i'm really bored, and have made it 8 in 2002. I have it on for 10 this year).
 
Last edited:

alex

Do not read this.
true - when giant-killing is carried out by dull teams (greece, 2004), it's no good for the game, and everyone bemoans it after. only when it's won by good footballing sides does it become interesting (eg Turkey in 2002, though they didn't kill any giants, rather just progressed way further than expected).

yea good point to be fair
 

crackerjack

Well-known member
true - when giant-killing is carried out by dull teams (greece, 2004), it's no good for the game, and everyone bemoans it after. only when it's won by good footballing sides does it become interesting (eg Turkey in 2002, though they didn't kill any giants, rather just progressed way further than expected).

Oh indeed. It's not giant-killing that's the problem, it's boring football. Maybe I'm wrong, but in my mind Switzerland are up there with Norway as a team who have never, ever tried to play the good stuff and just exist by squeezing the life out of the game. Not that they exactly did that today, but you get my drift :confused:.
 

BareBones

wheezy
well despite them being anti-football i don't really mind the swiss winning that match, as i thought it was an exciting game and i enjoyed watching it (the second half anyway).
 

baboon2004

Darned cockwombles.
controversial... but why not?

I'm not sure it is that controversial though - Spain have lost not to their strongest rivals, but their second strongest, and it always gets complicated when one team look likely to lose all three (sorry, Honduras fans). It's all a bit Germany-Austria-Algeria, with no Teutonic Pact to bail Spain out.

Spain will do well to beat Chile in the next (?) game - if they don't, their fate is no longer in their hands.

On the plus side, should Chile win the group, they could go far.
 

crackerjack

Well-known member
I'm not sure it is that controversial though - Spain have lost not to their strongest rivals, but their second strongest, and it always gets complicated when one team look likely to lose all three (sorry, Honduras fans). It's all a bit Germany-Austria-Algeria, with no Teutonic Pact to bail Spain out.

Spain will do well to beat Chile in the next (?) game - if they don't, their fate is no longer in their hands.

On the plus side, should Chile win the group, they could go far.

Good summary. Spain play Honduras next, Chile last. I reckon Navas should see more action - he introduced a random, direct element that wasn't there before.
 

crackerjack

Well-known member
This is well worth a read.

Many of the points discussed upthread given a good going over.

BBC in particular seem to pick their pundits at random out of an agent's roster. Why haven't they got Desailly this year? I thought he was top boy last time out, now he's in a bit-part role over at ITV.
 
Last edited:

franz

Well-known member
South Africa looks completely lame. No structure whatsoever, they are not going anywhere.

Spain beat themselves, certainly Switzerland played quite collapsed, but Spain was looking sufficiently superhuman that i really think they could have taken that game at any moment had they thought about penetrating differently. Has Iniesta been playing a sort of wing role for the national squad in the past? He doesn't fit there very well. Totally unwilling to take the line, and just making the wrong kind of services at any given moment.

Really just too many players working the same skill set on the field today. Until Fernando Torres came on they quite literally had nobody capable of breaking through the back line--and he is obviously a little bit rickety at the moment. It he's fit enough to start next game, i think they should have no trouble clearing this group.

I wouldn't be so cranky with this Uruguay SA game if i hadn't been spoiled with the Spanish passing clinic i woke up for this morning. There are pacing and spacing issues obviously, but that team looked waay way to strong in that first half to be discounted at this stage.
 

hucks

Your Message Here
Really just too many players working the same skill set on the field today. Until Fernando Torres came on they quite literally had nobody capable of breaking through the back line--and he is obviously a little bit rickety at the moment. It he's fit enough to start next game, i think they should have no trouble clearing this group.

Yeah, Alonso + Xavi + Iniesta + Silva is at least 25% too much tippy tappy. Two holding midfielders was a bit much today, too. Navas was good when he came on, like someone said upthread. Apparently, in Spain there's a bit of a discussion as to whether Villa and Torres are the sum of their parts when they play together
 
Top