the question is: do you think it just naturally/casually looks that way, or was put together by a stylist?
There was a big article about this photo shoot and its significance in 032C. It was definitely put together by a stylist, and that stylist was Twombly.
ya know...not a big deal but something about that whole concept has always rubbed me the wrong way. it's like buying new faded or ripped jeans, or shoes made to look like they are worn and scuffed up. those things are cool when they've happened naturally, not when they are consciously prefabricated to be so.
guess i'm just not a fan of "faux".
ya know...not a big deal but something about that whole concept has always rubbed me the wrong way. it's like buying new faded or ripped jeans, or shoes made to look like they are worn and scuffed up. those things are cool when they've happened naturally, not when they are consciously prefabricated to be so.
guess i'm just not a fan of "faux".
I dunno actually - I think that there's an interest both in a purely fabricated image of lifestyle / clothing / interior design as a sort of idealised representation of the subject (or just as something aesthetically pleasing in itself) and in actually realistically photographing how someone lives.
I guess I am a bit bothered by stuff that blurs the boundary, though - stuff that really does say "here is an extraordinary bohemian intellectual lifestyle that you bourgeois plebs can't even begin to aspire to" when in fact there's a comfy sofa and a bunch of random books and clutter and spare bedding and so on just out of shot...
I do love those pictures, though. They feel almost like a lost world, though - is there anyone who'd have an interior like that (ersatz or otherwise) today?