sufi
lala
I had an interesting conversation in a hipster espresso joint on the corner by Cambridge Heath with a veteran internet developer, who said they're bearing in mind the possibility of a coming world free of the internet, and worrying abut how the youth who can't even remember life before the internet will cope,
apple, rural north carolina
microsoft dublin
facebook arctic data centre
I think the big stacks are vulnerable - which will fall (first)?
What happens if/when it starts collapsing (or did that start already with 2.0, the centralised webs, the corporates, the onlining of everything into a useless chaos that lacks reasons to exist)? There are a deep assumptions inherent in our internet (cf dematerialisation thread): progress as a one way street, leading somewhere nice. i think all of that needs to be up for grabs?
It seems hard to imagine now, that maybe it won't always be this way, and maybe it can't be, maybe we don't even want it to be. In fact maybe we need it not to be like this?
So could that be why we need to imagine it quite urgently, maybe that would give us some power, which I think we really need???
It would be interesting to spend some time back in the actual pre-intenet world, the rural uncapitalised zones of this planet, to try and relearn basic socialisation skills and coping strategies that we have already forgotten that we ever had, like how to meet up with no mobile phones.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Proposals for how we get started?



I think the big stacks are vulnerable - which will fall (first)?
- Maybe not google, as it's like an hydra with so many disparate activities it must be hard to squish them all for good (android must die tho)
- but fb already started considering their responsibilities, & that might guide them towards a better way to exist,
- apple and twitter are vulnerable,
- apple to its own monolithicness and isolationism ,
- twitter to its inability to improve on it's original model, even now that it's over-extended and exploited.

What happens if/when it starts collapsing (or did that start already with 2.0, the centralised webs, the corporates, the onlining of everything into a useless chaos that lacks reasons to exist)? There are a deep assumptions inherent in our internet (cf dematerialisation thread): progress as a one way street, leading somewhere nice. i think all of that needs to be up for grabs?
It seems hard to imagine now, that maybe it won't always be this way, and maybe it can't be, maybe we don't even want it to be. In fact maybe we need it not to be like this?
So could that be why we need to imagine it quite urgently, maybe that would give us some power, which I think we really need???
It would be interesting to spend some time back in the actual pre-intenet world, the rural uncapitalised zones of this planet, to try and relearn basic socialisation skills and coping strategies that we have already forgotten that we ever had, like how to meet up with no mobile phones.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Proposals for how we get started?
