Great, but why isn't there a tidal wave of reinfections then?
You seem to mistaking absence of evidence for evidence of absence. Researchers would have to be looking for them in order for them to show up.Great, but why isn't there a tidal wave of reinfections then?
Myth-busting from Oxford's Prof. Sunetra Gupta:
Myth 1: We can keep it out
Myth 2: We are all going to die
Myth 3: We are nowhere close to herd immunity
Backfired somewhat, especially as the country ended up getting herd immunity in most parts anyway.
Trump did say it would be ready this year, and got shot down for it.What I don't understand is why all the right wing libertarian types didn't foresee the rapid development of the (mRNA) vaccines. They often seem to be pretty "science will solve it all, just you wait", but nobody thought that could happen within a year. Which is weird as Moderna apparantly made the vaccine in a few days, you'd though that someone had a insider clue.
I'm talking about infections, not deaths. And the "withs/ofs" distinction is now irrelevant, since they're only counting deaths from covid if they occur within 28 days of a positive diagnosis, bearing in mind that even when someone enters a nursing home, the remaining life expectancy is still around two years.@Mr. Tea the second wave of -withs is much shallower than the first despite worse weather - that's cos of HI.
Ha! So you've reached the level of "do your own research".That's not true re -with recording; find NHS data to reach enlightenment.
Pos tests are a different thing to current infections or even cases.
This spoonfeeding is tiresome; do some research yourself too.
hmmm. but its just not that simple is it. co-morbidities. im in hospital with a massive brain tumour and on my last legs. I catch covid in there and die a week later. how did i die? mostly brain tumour. did covid quicken the process? possibly. covid will be on my death certificate and ill be recorded as a covid death but how will my family say I died? this isnt to say the data is wrong, its just a very simple and quite misleading way to talk about mortality rates because it doesn't account for any complexityHa! So you've reached the level of "do your own research".
Anyway, the government is presenting both covid deaths within 28 days of a positive test *and* deaths following a positive test after any interval of time. Now the vast majority of people can expect to live for more than 28 day from any given day, even in a nursing home, so for these deaths the distinction between "with" and "of" is meaningless. It's people who've been killed by the virus.
Sure, there are going to be some cases like that, but how many, really? Not a statistically significant number, I think. I mean a disease that only kills people who have a few weeks left to live isn't going to make any difference to the overall number of deaths in a year.hmmm. but its just not that simple is it. co-morbidities. im in hospital with a massive brain tumour and on my last legs. I catch covid in there and die a week later. how did i die? mostly brain tumour. did covid quicken the process? possibly. covid will be on my death certificate and ill be recorded as a covid death but how will my family say I died? this isnt to say the data is wrong, its just a very simple and quite misleading way to talk about mortality rates because it doesn't account for any complexity
likewise with specific cancer deaths, any year theres a bad flu in winter theres a big spike in cancer deaths. id say very few of those families say their relatives died of flu, even tho flu finished them off