i think thats a bit harsh. i don't like trance as much as anyone but there were some truly astounding proto trance records, when it was still a variant of techno and acid. and there is some quite interesting uk trancecore.
this one originally released in 92 on labworks, then reissued in 96 for the UK crowds. this to me is ideally what trance should have always been. which it was for a short while in mid 92.
Sure, the roots of trance are another story. There's all kinds of interesting axes there. Rising high, GPR, FAX, the ambient house/chill out lineage. Pete Namlook's entire discography started with ambient B sides to trance(ish) records.
Its when the style solidifies that things get nasty.
I think that's not just true of trance though is it?
Yes but my point is simply that there are a lot of types of music that could be created algorithmically.
I think it pretty much is what he was saying to be honest. Maybe he was also saying it was more obviously algorithmic than most types of music (emphasis on obviously there).that's not what leo was saying though. are you high?
Withplugged in the desired start and end points, hit "enter" and then let the program run a spreadsheet of data points in a perfect arc. one element added at a time, each getting an equal amount of time, building step by step, first up then down.
And you'll begin to understand."a set of rules that precisely defines a sequence of operations"
That was pretty much what I was implying yeah.music is all algorithm.