Mr. Tea

Let's Talk About Ceps
this is not the way to form a position though is it, this is why you are uniquely mush-brained
It's more the paucity of the arguments made against them, such as:

"They will discriminate against the most vulnerable" - no, it's the most vulnerable who've already suffered the most as a direct result of the pandemic, and who will gain the most through being vaccinated and being surrounded by other vaccinated people.

"I don't want the government tracking me" - fine then, I assume you've already trashed your laptop and phone and are living in a hut in the woods? Because if not, then you're just a blowhard poseur.
 

luka

Well-known member
It's more the paucity of the arguments made against them, such as:

"They will discriminate against the most vulnerable" - no, it's the most vulnerable who've already suffered the most as a direct result of the pandemic, and who will gain the most through being vaccinated and being surrounded by other vaccinated people.

"I don't want the government tracking me" - fine then, I assume you've already trashed your laptop and phone and are living in a hut in the woods? Because if not, then you're just a blowhard poseur.
i dont think this is the case. you get your sense of what 'the other side' think via quote tweets on centrist twitter
 

Mr. Tea

Let's Talk About Ceps
Well, the legitimate progressive position is we do not have sufficient evidence to call the shots of the booster re: neutralisation of omicron variant, either way, but initial results seem to indicate that antibody immunity induced by the phizer vaccine is escaped.

But it's hardly as if you don't take pride in ignorance, you just rotate it from the political to the scientific realm.

Nobody really knows anything about omicron because it's only just cropped up, and I wasn't talking about specifically about boosters, either. I was talking about vaccination more generally.
 

Murphy

cat malogen
FRANK:

(continuing; breathing heavily)

You feel good. Feel my muscles.

(Raymond makes Jeffrey raise his arm and Jeffrey feels Frank's biceps.)

FRANK:

(continuing)

You like that?

(to Raymond and Paul)

Hold him tight for me.
 

Mr. Tea

Let's Talk About Ceps
I actually suspect this will become a movement eventually, if it hasn't already. Radical luddism. Destroying parts of the IoT or even parts of the internet more abstractly.
I wonder how these ideas will be propagated, though? Paper pamphlets handed out on street corners? Wild-eyed men carrying placards and yelling in megaphones? They usually get good results.
 

Clinamenic

Binary & Tweed
I wonder how these ideas will be propagated, though? Paper pamphlets handed out on street corners? Wild-eyed men carrying placards and yelling in megaphones? They usually get good results.
Actually I don't think these hypothetical radical luddites would have a problem using social media platforms, or maybe just old messageboard platforms like this. That is, I wouldn't expect such ideological consistency, just people who want to curb or combat the digitization of global society, which ultimately strikes me as a futile effort.
 

Mr. Tea

Let's Talk About Ceps
Actually I don't think these hypothetical radical luddites would have a problem using social media platforms, or maybe just old messageboard platforms like this. That is, I wouldn't expect such ideological consistency, just people who want to curb or combat the digitization of global society, which ultimately strikes me as a futile effort.
The idea of people using Facebook and whatnot to propagate a message like "YOU ARE BEING BRAINWASHED! JOIN US TO GET UNBRAINWASHED!!!" has a certain appealing irony, it has to be said.

Using old-skool messageboards could be cool, too. Like a very specific version of the Amish: "We reject all technology introduced after 2003."
 

luka

Well-known member
we literally have a thread about how to kill the internet. sufi says its just a matter of snipping a few wires like yyyyaldrin snipped teas testicular piping
 

luka

Well-known member
 

thirdform

pass the sick bucket
Nobody really knows anything about omicron because it's only just cropped up, and I wasn't talking about specifically about boosters, either. I was talking about vaccination more generally.

So what is your argument then? That people believe silly shit? That's been the case since time immemorial.

I don't go for the authoritarian/anti-authoritarian binary, but I would agree with yyaldrin that the left (or radicals at least) should have adopted a more critical position towards the state, whilst emphasising the danger of the virus. What we have is a real denying of reality rn (as in, a denying of reality that is actually grounded in the real) something which you seem to say is just the preserve of far right cranks. OK, it may be that, but then merely tells us that the right is winning given the liberal/left response has been to side with the state reducing most human intercourse to bare life and little else. Now you can go on about tory/republican incompetence if you want to play that game, but what is your response after that? That we are going to work to a hypothetically zero-covid scenario, a scenario that moreover will not come?

The problem with the anti-vaccers is not this, it's that they think that we can go back to normal. There is no new normal. A better way to think about this is covid is the first premonition of the impending climate catastrophe.
 

Mr. Tea

Let's Talk About Ceps
Go on then, do it!
 

luka

Well-known member
So what is your argument then? That people believe silly shit? That's been the case since time immemorial.

I don't go for the authoritarian/anti-authoritarian binary, but I would agree with yyaldrin that the left (or radicals at least) should have adopted a more critical position towards the state, whilst emphasising the danger of the virus. What we have is a real denying of reality rn (as in, a denying of reality that is actually grounded in the real) something which you seem to say is just the preserve of far right cranks. OK, it may be that, but then merely tells us that the right is winning given the liberal/left response has been to side with the state reducing most human intercourse to bare life and little else. Now you can go on about tory/republican incompetence if you want to play that game, but what is your response after that? That we are going to work to a hypothetically zero-covid scenario, a scenario that moreover will not come?

The problem with the anti-vaccers is not this, it's that they think that we can go back to normal. There is no new normal. A better way to think about this is covid is the first premonition of the impending climate catastrophe.
third has been taking notes from his favourite thinker, me.
 
Top