Re plato, I do understand reservations, once he starts talking about how to actually run the Republic, you start to think, er...
But aristotle I thought was a good antidote to that, the way he conceptualise eudamonia as essentially a happy medium of things. I thought that was very common sense.
A contrast between their two ways of thinking was actually the central part of my proposed mphil, I was going to look at their relationship and compare/contrast with the relationship between modernity and post modernity.
But aristotle I thought was a good antidote to that, the way he conceptualise eudamonia as essentially a happy medium of things. I thought that was very common sense.
A contrast between their two ways of thinking was actually the central part of my proposed mphil, I was going to look at their relationship and compare/contrast with the relationship between modernity and post modernity.