Don't worry it's all part of the master plan. Arrests coming soon!I notice that Newsmax have settled their suit with the CEO of Dominion... they apologised for lying and so on. Gonna be hard for them and everyone else to fight off the suit from Dominion itself when it arrives...
One of the comments on twitter was "Dominion will never get away with a Steal again, this is a big win for the GOP".
I didn't realise it would take so long to make up some bullshit about Dominion either to be fair.A GOP lawmaker, who voted for the sketchy Arizona audit, is having second thoughts. “It makes us look like idiots,“ Paul Boyer said. “Looking back, I didn’t think it would be this ridiculous. It’s embarrassing to be a state senator at this point.“
This appears to be a particularly insane group even in this mad world.The younger Moon, who set up shop in 2017 in Newfoundland, Pennsylvania, follows the doctrine of his late father—with a twist. Moon says he was inspired by a biblical passage in the Book of Revelation that talked about Jesus using a “rod of iron” to protect himself and others. He concluded this was a reference to AR-15s, and integrated high-powered firearms into regular church services, including wedding ceremonies. He founded the church with the support of his brother, Kook-jin “Justin” Moon, the CEO of Kahr Arms, a gun manufacturing company headquartered nearby.
One interesting thing in filing on suspending Giuliani's law license: It cites him for lying that PA sent out fewer mail-in ballots than it received. Rudy's response? "Respondent does not deny that his..statement, that only 1.8 million mail-in ballots were requested, was untrue."
The defendants' lawyers are stuck in this weird situation where they have to say that the claims they made were not statements of fact and yet at the same time claim that they believed them and that they were true.The motion to dismiss Domiion's lawsuit (the one about "no reasonable person") will be in court in an hour.
Oh dear.Court asks a basic question. What legal authority is there for court to de-certify a state’s election results? Response is vague reference to Bush v Gore. Court says that decision stands for the “direct opposite.”