sufi
lala
no objection to the substance thenthat's right. that's why we are rejecting it. sorry soof, back to the drawing board
no objection to the substance thenthat's right. that's why we are rejecting it. sorry soof, back to the drawing board
i agreeobjections to the very notion of a corporate good behaviour code for dissensus.
If Mumsnet’s women’s rights forum is popular because it responds to the experience of being stuck at home without support or community, it’s done so in a way that leaves Mumsnetters in a political cul-de-sac. The community isolates its members in a bubble of transphobic thought that leaves them free to develop their bigotries without needing to encounter the human beings affected by them. It also inculcates members with a tragically narrow idea of feminism, one that rejects other people fighting for gender liberation. And finally, it puts followers at odds with the broader left, which has been fighting for a world without gender oppression, as well as for benefits Mumsnetters say they care about, such as free child care and well-funded health care.
Seriously, you would like that? What a terrifying thought.i'd like to invite Lux Magazine to give this place an audit
Here ya go Suf - that other internet POVIf it applies to the whole internet already, i think this place would score well in comparison to the rest
well, not 100% serious i must admitSeriously, you would like that? What a terrifying thought.
A feminist server ....
- Is a situated technology. Her sense of context results from a federation of competences
- Is run for and by a community that cares enough for her in order to make her exist
- Has an awareness of the materiality of software, hardware and the bodies gathered around it
- Treats network technology as part of a social reality
- Is able to scale up or down, and change processing speed whenever resources require
- At the risk of exposing her own insecurity, opens up processes, tools, sources, habits, patterns
- Does not strive for seamlessness. Talk of transparency too often signals that something needs to be made invisible
- Radically questions the conditions for serving and service; experiments with changing client - server relations where she can
- Avoids efficiency, ease-of-use and reliability because they can be traps
- Knows that networking is actually a parasitic, promiscuous and often awkward practice
- Is autonomous in the sense that she tries to decide for her own dependencies
- Takes control because she wants networks to be mutable and read-write accessible
- Faces her freedom with determination. Vulnerability is not an alibi
- Is a paranodal (we did not mean: paranoid) technology. A feminist server is both inside and outside the network
- Does not confuse a sense of false security with providing a safe place
- Tries hard not to apologize when she is sometimes not available
Computer w Breats and Vagina : One Sex PlsDissensus is