I think what I was getting at is that postmodernism (as a condition) seems unable to bring about new ways of living (as you mentioned, modernisms obsession with newness, finding new ways of living re: marxism and etc. being a huge part of that). You can look at the current tumult as a rebellion against this limit, the inability to escape the current moment, in accordance with a rebellion against any specific oppression. (not to undermine the extent of the oppression)
Sort of like being prompted to procure some example on the spot, and being unable to. Something impotently artificial about the attempts to "bring about new ways of living", as if the process is being short circuited and deprived of the ability to organically develop into something of genuine, and perhaps novel, value.
And arguably the primary requirement for such a process is belief in the process, and that kind of belief seems to have been shaken across the board, no? Like we can't engage in something that history has ostensibly demonstrated as being ineffective - but perhaps ineffective at absolute transcendence, which is arguably
not the thing we should be aiming at.
Perhaps that is the lesson to learn, a sort of cosmic temperance.