you can see this in the various militant twitter posts and also in that soldier's manifesto someone posted that he wrote before going on a killing spree. people who are unhinged latching on to bizarre notions of honour and duty nicked from shit films and cheesy computer games
I saw this article on this website Return of Kings which is this thing for red-pilled people (generally men for some reason) to talk about how macho and great they are, sometimes I remember it exists and then I read it a bit for a laugh. Then I try and forget about it again cos if you read everything on the internet that is stupid enough to make you laugh then it would absorb your entire life.
But anyway, the article I read, this guy's point was... well I think in fact ostensibly it was about why he didn't like football and preferred proper manly sports like fighting sports cos in those you don't have a team to rely on and cover your pathetic weaknesses and so on, it's just you and another guy fighting each other honourably and not at all gayly in any way.... whatever, but he went off on this convoluted thing about chivalry and how medieval times were great cos of knights fighting each other with honour to win the hands of maidens who stayed in their rightful place (in the bad guy's dungeon normally until you rescued them). And obviously there was so much shit in there that to actually pull it apart and point this out seems cruel... but there was one particular thing that jumped out at me in a sense.
I mean, let's assume that knights did all really have honour and all they cared about was finding another knight and having a fair fight with him to see who was truly the better man - let's assume that everything you've read about knights in their quest for the grail or whatever, you know, all the great stories about knights are all true, that all knights existed in their most idealised form (which I suspect they didn't) what this guy seemed to be missing was the fact that not everyone was a knight. And, if you are based in the UK (probably anywhere in Europe in fact) you can work out fairly easily if you would have been a knight... I'm not Sir Idle Rich (or lord or anything believe it or not) and so I wouldn't have been a knight, I would have been a pleb, probably planting and digging turnips for fourteen hours today and completely unable to chivalry or whatever.
And putting this era on a pedestal cos you believe that there was some kind of honour between knights is utterly moronic, you need to take into consideration the fact that ninety nine point nine percent of people didn't even know what honour was and would slit their neighbour's throat to get his carrots.
Though that's not to say that I disagree with this
I'm not convinced its impossible to reclaim certain critical traditional values without sacrificing some of the more egalitarian values enabled by the subsidence of such traditions.
Probably isn't impossible but you would have to think really carefully about how to design a scenario that could make it possible. It definitely doesn't just fall into your lap.
And that's just the boring logistics of it, once you got into the theory behind it it would be even harder of course.