I've lost count of the accusations and counter-accusations of strawmanism at this point, but anyway: who is it that's assuming "vaccination prevents the spread"? And who is it that's propagating this idea? Everything I've seen in the media about this has almost been at pains to point out that vaccination reduces your chances of catching this or that variant by however many percent. It's not saying "Get vaxxed, become invulnerable."It is, but I'm saying there are people still labouring under the assumption it can be eradicated when we don't really know that.
Also, I'm not arguing the vaccine's bunk because people may still be catching the virus. You've created a strawman to point to as a strawman. I'm arguing that if vaccinated people are still spreading the virus then it weakens the argument in favour of vaccine mandates because it's partly based on the assumption that vaccination prevents the spread.
It can’t be eradicated and a vaccine resistant strain is semi-inevitable....
Antibiotic resistant gonorrhoea is out there, you wonder if the medical era we were brought up in is subsiding quickly
Well, that's the only time I've ever used the term in this discussion as I make a point of not using it, so you can note down a single use of "strawman" from me.I've lost count of the accusations and counter-accusations of strawmanism at this point, but anyway: who is it that's assuming "vaccination prevents the spread"? And who is it that's propagating this idea? Everything I've seen in the media about this has almost been at pains to point out that vaccination reduces your chances of catching this or that variant by however many percent. It's not saying "Get vaxxed, become invulnerable."
Again, the fact of vaccines not being 100% effective on an individual level totally ignores the fact that vaccines are not intended to work only the individual, and that some people have a good medical reason for not being vaccinated.
Not that those are necessarily directly comparable to a respiratory virus, but clearly there have been plenty of diseases which, at least in many countries, have been totally eradicated.And yet, polio, smallpox...
You keep saying that as though I'm arguing things can never be eradicated when what I'm saying is we have to consider the possibility that not everything can be eradicated.And yet, polio, smallpox...
Sounded a lot like you were saying it was definitely impossible and therefore shouldn't even be attempted.You keep saying that as though I'm arguing things can never be eradicated when what I'm saying is we have to consider the possibility that not everything can be eradicated.
I'm arguing we might have to accept we can't eradicate it after almost two years and God knows how much money attempting to. I wasn't arguing this before that attempt.Sounded a lot like you were saying it was definitely impossible and therefore shouldn't even be attempted.
It is, but I'm saying there are people still labouring under the assumption it can be eradicated when we don't really know that.
I'm arguing we might have to accept we can't eradicate it after almost two years and God knows how much money attempting to.
Me and versh get on fine even when we disagree about something, because we are mature grown-ups.tea is trying to break the only person on this forum who has yet to call him a cunt! the final test of his strength!
I wonder how he would go about this. Probably make a private conversation with everyone but Tea. Seems more efficient than sending out individual messages to everyone but Tea.he calls you a cunt behind your back